New Zealand Law Commission
|
|
[Home]
[Databases]
[WorldLII]
[Search]
[Feedback]
New Zealand Law Commission |
|
[Database Search] [Name Search] [Previous] [Download] [Help]
Reports
Law Reform Commission of British Columbia, Statutory Succession Rights (1982) Working Paper No 35
Law Reform Commission of British Columbia, Statutory Succession Rights (1986) Report No 70
Ministerial Committee on Assisted Human Reproduction – Navigating Our Future (Department of Justice, Tribunals Division, Wellington, 1994)
Scottish Law Commission, Report on Succession (1990) Report No 124
Department of Justice, Report of the Working Group on Matrimonial Property and Family Protection (1988, Department of Justice, Wellington)
Queensland Law Reform Commission, Report of the Law Reform Commission on the Law Relating to Succession (1978) Report 22
Books
Adams and others (eds), Butterworths Family Law in New Zealand (6th ed, Butterworths, Wellington, 1993); (7th ed, Butterworths, Wellington, 1995)
Atherton and Vines, Australian Succession Law: Families, Property and Death (Butterworths, Sydney, 1996)
Auckland Lesbian and Gay Lawyers Group Inc, Outlaw: A Legal Guide for Lesbians and Gay Men in New Zealand (AGLG, Auckland, 1994)
Austin and others, Trapski’s Family Law
vol 5 (Brooker’s, Wellington, 1995)
Austin, Children: Stories the Law Tells (Victoria University Press, Wellington, 1994)
Bromley and Lowe, Bromley’s Family Law (7th ed, Butterworths, London, 1987)
Certoma, The Law of Succession in New South Wales (2nd ed, Law Book Co, Sydney, 1992)
Davies, Family Law in Canada (4th ed, Carswell, Toronto, 1984)
Finch and Masson, Negotiating Family Responsibilities (Tavistock/Routledge, London, 1993)
Fowler and others, Trapski’s Family Law
vol 2 (1992, Brooker’s, Wellington)
Freeman (ed), State, Law, and the Family (Tavistock, London, 1984)
Gittins, The Family in Question (2nd ed, MacMillan, London, 1991)
Hardingham and others, Wills and Intestacy in Australia and New Zealand (2nd ed, Law Book Co, Sydney, 1989)
Henaghan and Atkin, Family Law Policy in New Zealand (Oxford University Press, Auckland, 1992)
Hovius and Youdan, The Law of Family Property (Carswell, Toronto, 1991)
Langbein and Waggoner (eds), Selected Statutes on Trusts and Estates (Foundation Press, New York, 1995)
Ludbrook and others (eds), Ludbrook’s Family Law Service (Brookers, Wellington, 1986)
Maxton (ed), Nevill’s Law of Trusts, Wills and Administration (8th ed, Butterworths, Wellington, 1985)
Metge, New Growth from Old: The Whänau in the Modern World (Victoria University Press, Wellington, 1995)
Patterson, Family Protection and Testamentary Promises in New Zealand (Butterworths, Wellington, 1985); (2nd ed, Butterworths, Wellington, 1994)
Articles
Atkin, “Family Property Law Reform” (1995) 25 VUWLR 77
Cretney, “Succession – Discretion or Whim, Freedom of Choice or Caprice?” (1986) 6 OJLS 299
Djalleta, “A Twinkle in a Descendant’s Eye: Proposed Amendments to the Uniform Probate Code in Light of New Reproductive Technology” (1994) 67 Temple LR 335
Estin, “Love and Obligation: Family Law and the Romance of Economics” (1995) 36 William and Mary LR 989
Freeman, “Whither Children: Protection, Participation, Autonomy?” (1994) 22 Manitoba LJ 307
Glendon, “The New Family and The New Property” (1979) 53 Tulane LR 697
Glendon, “Fixed Rules and Discretion in Contemporary Family Law and Succession Law” (1986) 60 Tulane LR 1165
Hardie Boys, “Judicial Attitudes to Family Property” (1994) 24 VUWLR 235
Hendra, “Stepfamilies: an Invisible Populace” (1993) 1 BFLJ 3
Hendra, “Stepfamilies: a Fresh Approach” (1993) 1 BFLJ 26
Langbein, “The Twentieth-Century Revolution in Family Wealth Transmission” (1988) 86 Mich LR 722
McMorland, “Succession” [1989] NZ Rec LR 72; [1989] NZ Rec LR 265; [1990] NZ Rec LR 238; [1991] NZ Rec LR 178; [1993] NZ Rec LR 196; [1995] NZLR 156
Meston, “Succession – Rights or Discretion?” (1989) 32 Jur Rev 1
Morton, “The Theory of Inheritance” (1894–1895) 7 Harv LR 161
Nussbaum, “Liberty of Testation” (1937) 23 ABA J 183
O’Donnell, “Protection of Family Life and the ECHR” (1995) 17 J Social Welfare and Fam L 261
Rein, “Relatives by Blood, Adoption and Association: Who Should Get What and Why?” (1984) 37 Vanderbilt Law Review 711
Smith, “Succession Problems Arising from Artificial Insemination, Surrogate Motherhood and Test Tube Babies: A Proposed Solution” (1989) 40 Juvenile & Family Ct J 15
Soul, “Spanish Succession Law” (1991) 135 SJ 1056
Sutton, “Law Commission Succession Project: Communal Family Property?” (1995) 25 VUWLR 53
Tapp, “Family Law” [1994] NZ Rec LR 140
Papers
Cone and Matthews, Testamentary Promises, Family Protection and Other Estate Litigation Matters (NZLS Seminar Paper, April–May 1992)
Eaton, Farm Succession, Viability and Retirement (MAF Policy Technical Paper
93/16, A Report for the Rural Resources Unit, Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, November 1993)
Hassall and others (eds), Toward a Child and Family Policy for New Zealand (Office of the Commissioner for Children, Wellington, 1991)
Harrison and Maze, Family Law Agreements (NZLS Seminar Paper, June 1996)
Keating and Little, Retirement and Succession in Farm Families in New Zealand (South Island) (MAF Policy Technical Paper 94/7, Report to MAF Policy, February 1994)
New Zealand Planning Council, For Richer or Poorer (New Zealand Planning Council, Wellington, 1988)
Thorns, “Housing Wealth and Inheritance in New Zealand” in Forrest and Murie, Housing and Wealth – Comparative and International Perspectives (Routledge, London, 1995), 33
Reports
Alberta Institute of Law Research and Reform, Matrimonial Property (1974) Working Paper
Alberta Institute of Law Research and Reform, Matrimonial Property (1975) Report
Alberta Institute of Law Research and Reform, Matrimonial Property: Division of Pension Benefits Upon Marriage Breakdown (1986) Report No 48
Australian Law Reform Commission, Matrimonial Property (1985) Discussion Paper No 22
Australian Law Reform Commission, Matrimonial Property (1987) Report No 39
Australian Law Reform Commission, Equality Before the Law: Justice for Women (1994) Report No 69
Australian Senate Legal and Constitutional Legislation Committee, Second Report on the Family Law Reform Bill 1994 and the Family Law Reform Bill (No 2) 1994 (Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia, 1995)
Law Commission (England and Wales), Family Law: Family Property Law (1971) Working Paper No 42
Law Commission (England and Wales), Family Law: Family Property: A New Approach (1973) Report No 52
Law Commission (England and Wales), Second Report on Family Property: Family Provision on Death (1974) Report 61
Law Reform Commission of British Columbia, Property Rights on Marriage Breakdown (1990) Report No 111
Law Reform Commission of Canada, Family Property (1975) Working Paper No 8
Law Reform Commission of Saskatchewan, Division of Matrimonial Property: Problems Within the Present Law (1974) First Mini-working Paper, publication 1
Law Reform Commission of Saskatchewan, Division of Matrimonial Property: Possible Solutions to Problems within the Present Law (1974) Second Mini-working Paper, publication 2
Law Reform Commission of Saskatchewan, Division of Matrimonial Property: Tentative Proposals for Reform of Matrimonial Property Law (1974) Third working Paper, publication 3
Law Reform Commission of Saskatchewan, Proposals for a Saskatchewan Matrimonial Homes Act (1976) Report, publication 10
Manitoba Law Reform Commission, Family Law: Part I: The Support Obligation; Part II: Property Disposition (1976) Reports No 23 and 24
Manitoba Law Reform Commission, An Examination of ‘the Dower Act’ (1984) Report No 60
Manitoba Law Reform Commission, The Married Women’s Property Act (1985) Report No 64
Matrimonial Property – Comparable Sharing: An Explanation of the Matrimonial Property Bill 1975 (1975) AJHR E.6
New Brunswick Justice Department Law Reform Division, Matrimonial Property Reform for New Brunswick (January 1978) Discussion Paper
Ontario Law Reform Commission, Report on Family Law, Part IV: Family Property Law (1974)
Ontario Law Reform Commission, Report on Family Property Law (1993)
Report of the Joint Select Committee on Certain Aspects of the Operation and Interpretation of the Family Law Act (AGPS, Canberra, November 1992)
Report of a Special Committee, Matrimonial Property (Government Printer, Wellington, 1972)
Scottish Law Commission, Matrimonial Property (1981) Consultative Memorandum No 57
Scottish Law Commission, Family Law: Ailment and Family Provision (1981) Report No 67
Scottish Law Commission, Family Law: Matrimonial Property (1984) Report No 86
Scottish Law Commission, Family Law (1992) Report No 135
Books
Fisher, Fisher on Matrimonial Property (2nd ed, Butterworths, Wellington, 1984)
Weitzman, The Divorce Revolution: The Unexpected Consequences for Women and Children in America (Free Press, New York, 1985)
Articles
Angelo and Atkin, “The Matrimonial Property Bill 1975 – Some Further Thoughts” [1976] NZLJ 424
Angelo and Atkin, “A Conceptual and Structural Overview of the Matrimonial Property Act 1976” (1977) 7 NZULR 237
Armstrong, “The Impact of Matrimonial Law on the Administration of Deceased Estates” (1969) 2 Otago LR 120
Asher, “How Unequal can Equal be? Reform of the Matrimonial Property Act 1976, 10 Years On” (1987) 1 FLB 151
Atkin, “The Survival of Fault in Contemporary Family Law in New Zealand” (1979) 10 VUWLR 93
Atkin, “Spousal Maintenance: A New Philosophy” (1980) 9 NZULR 336
Atkin, “Matrimonial Property: Time to Take Stock” [1985] NZLJ 25
Atkin, “More Law Reform: The Report of the Working Group on Matrimonial Property and Family Protection October 1988” (1988) 2 FLB 18
Averill, “An Eclectic History and Analysis of the 1990 Uniform Probate Code” (1992) 55 Albany LR 891
Baker, “Contracting for Security: Paying Married Women What They’ve Earned” (1988) 55 Uni Chicago LR 1193
Bala, “Recognising Spousal Contributions to the Acquisition of Degrees, Licences and Career Assets – Towards Compensatory Support” (1989) 8 Can J Fam L 23
Bartke, “Community Property Law Reform in the United States and in Canada – A Comparison and Critique” (1976) 50 Tulane LR 213
Bartke, “Marital Property Law Reform: Canadian Style” (1977) 25 American Journal of Comparative Law 16
Bartke, “Ontario Bill 6, or How Not to Reform Marital Property Rights” (1977) 9 Ottawa LR 321
Bates, “Reforming Australian Matrimonial Property Law” (1988) 17 Anglo-American LR 46
Baxter, “Family Law Reform in Ontario” (1975) 25 University Toronto LJ 236
Baxter, “First Report on Family Property: A New Approach” (1974) 37 MLR 1975
Bisson, “The Reform of the Law Regarding Maintenance and Settlement of Property Rights between Spouses in Matrimonial Disputes” [1963] NZLJ 241
Bordow and Harrison, “Outcomes of Matrimonial Property Litigation” (1994) 8 Aust J Fam Law 264
Bradbury, “From Civil Death to Separate Property: Changes in the Legal Rights of Married Women in Nineteenth Century New Zealand” (1995) 29 NZ J of Hist 40
Brinig, “The Law and Economics of No-Fault Divorce – A Review of No-Fault Divorce: What Went Wrong?” (1993) 26 FLQ 453
Caldwell, “Judicial Discretion and Maintenance” [1987] NZLJ 148
Campbell, “The Matrimonial Fortress” [1957] 32 NZLJ 344
Charlesworth, “Domestic Contributions to Matrimonial Property” (1989) 3 Aust J Fam L 147
Corbin, “Ontario ‘Modernizes’ its Succession Law Reform Act” (1995) 14 E & TJ 205
Cossman, “A Matter of Difference: Domestic Contracts and Gender Equality” (1990) 28 Osgoode Hall LJ 303
Deech, “The Principles of Maintenance” (1977) 7 Fam L 229
Deech, “Financial Relief: The Retreat from Precedent and Principle” (1982) 98
LQR 621
Diduck and Orton, “Equality and Support for Spouses” (1994) 57 MLR 681
Dodds, “The Impact of the Roman Law of Succession and Marriage on Women’s Property and Independence” (1992) 18 Melbourne University LR 899
Duclos, “Breaking the Dependency Cycle: The Family Law Act Reconsidered” (1987) 45 University Toronto LJ 1
Eberts, “A Synopsis of Proposals for Family Property Reform” (1974) 1 Estates and Trusts Quarterly 298
Eekelaar, “Equality and the Purpose of Maintenance” (1988) 15 JLS 188
Ennor, “The Matrimonial Property Act 1963 – A New Deal?” [1972] NZLJ 500
Ennor, “The ‘Reasonable’ Approach to Matrimonial Property Division” [1974] 9 Recent Law 75 (Part 1); [1974] 9 Recent Law 111 (Part 2)
Erlanger and May, “The Surviving Spouse’s Right to Quasi-Community Property: A Proposal Based on the Uniform Probate Code” (1994) 30 Idaho LR 671
Fineman, “Societal Factors Affecting the Creation of Legal Rules for the Distribution of Property on Divorce” (1989) 23 FLQ 279
Fisher, “The Matrimonial Property Bill – Misguided Chivalry?” [1976] NZLJ 253
Fisher and Curnutte, “Reforming the Law of Intestate Succession and Intestate Shares” (1990) 93 West Virginia LR 61
Fratcher, “Towards Uniform Succession Legislation” (1966) 41 NYULR 1037
Glover, “Professional Education as Matrimonial Property” [1983] NZLJ 180 (Part 1); [1984] NZLJ 157 (Part 2)
Goodman, “A Critique of Family Property Reform” (1974) 1 Estates and Trusts Quarterly 315
Goodman, “Proposed Amendments to the Family Law Act Dealing with the Death of a Spouse” (1994) 13 E & TJ 365
Graycar, “Matrimonial Property Law Reform and Equality for Women: Discourses in Discord?” (1995) 25 VUWLR 9
Hahlo, “Matrimonial Property Regimes: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow” (1973) 11 Osgoode Hall LJ 455
Hargrave, “Matrimonial Regimes” (1994) 54 Louisiana LR 733
Hart, “The Origin of the Restraint upon Anticipation” (1924) 40 LQR 221
Haskell, “The Power of Disinheritance: A Proposal for Reform” (1964) Geo LJ 499
Haskins, “The Development of Common Law Dower” (1948) 62 Harv LR 42
Hodder (ed), “Death and Matrimonial Property” [1985] 8 TCL 46/385
Hodder (ed), “Matrimonial Property Act 1963 Case Surveys” [1991] 14 TCL 6/7–9; [1991] 14 TCL 7/7–9; [1991] 14 TCL 8/7–8
Holden, “F W Guest Memorial Lecture: With my worldly goods I thee endow – The Division of Family Assets at Law” (1975) 3 Otago LR 281
Holland, “Reform of Matrimonial Property Law in Ontario” (1978) 1 Can J of Fam
Law 1
Inglis, “The Matrimonial Community Chest” (1967) 2 NZULR 326
Inglis, “Recent Developments in Family Law” [1966] NZLJ 38
Inglis, “The Matrimonial Property Bill – Comparable Chaos?” [1976] NZLJ 321
Inglis, “The Family, Family Law, Family Lawyers and the Family Court of the Future” (1995) 8 Otago LR 301
Jackson, “Economic Justice in Divorce” (1995) 2 Cardozo Women’s LJ 23
Jacobson, “Recent Proposals for Reform of Family Property Law in the Common Law Provinces” (1975) 21 McGill LJ 556
Johnston and Johnston, “Marriage Breakdown: ‘Clean Break’ or Compound Fracture?” (1985) 1 FLB 23
Kahn-Freund, “Recent Legislation in Matrimonial Property” (1970) 33 MLR 601
Kelsey and Marks, “The Matrimonial Property Bill 1975” (1976) 8 VUWLR 343
Knetsch, “Some Economic Implications of Matrimonial Property Rules” (1984) 34 University of Toronto LJ 263
Kovacs, “Matrimonial Property Law Reform in Australia: The ‘Home and Chattels’ Expedient. Studies in the Art of Compromise” (1980) 6 University of Tasmania LR 227
Krauskopf and Krauskopf, “Sharing in Practice: The Effects of the Matrimonial Property Act 1976” (1988) 1 FLB 140
Krauskopf and Krauskopf, “Comparable Sharing in Practice: A Pilot Study of Results under the Matrimonial Property Act of 1976” (1988) 18 VUWLR 21
Langbein and Waggoner, “Redesigning the Spouse’s Forced Share” (1987) 22 Real Property Probate and Trust Journal 303
Lawson, “Domestic Contribution and the Allocation of Property on Marital Breakdown: A Comparative Study of New Zealand and Australia” (1994) 13 University of Tasmania LR 294
“Legislation Note: Family Law” (1964) 1 NZULR 328
McCall, “Dissolving the Economic Partnership of Marriage” (1979–1982) 14 University Western Aust LR 365
McCauliff, “The Medieval English Marriage Portion from Cases of Mort D’Ancestor and Formedon” (1993) 38 Villanova LR 933
Mansell, “Whither Matrimonial Property?” (1971) 4 NZULR 271
Miller, “The Reform of the Law Relating to Financial Provision and Matrimonial Property” (1980) 15 Cambrian LR 73
Miller, “Provision for a Surviving Spouse” (1986) 102 LQR 445
Minow, “Learning to Live with the Dilemma of Difference” (1985) 48 Law and Contemporary Problems 157
Nixon, “The Matrimonial Property Bill – Misguided Chivalry?” [1976] NZLJ 438
Payne, “Family Property Reform as Perceived by the Law Reform Commission of Canada” (1976) 24 Chitty’s LJ 289
Pedersen, “Matrimonial Property Law in Denmark” (1965) 28 MLR 137
Pepperell (ed), “Matrimonial Property and Creditors” [1995] 19 TCL 9/1
Picou, “Administration of Marital Community upon Death: Movement toward Reform” (1995) 22 Southern University
LR 309
Prager, “Sharing Principles and the Future of Marital Property Law” (1977–1978) 25 UCLA LR 6
Priestley, “Matrimonial Property Systems” [1972] NZLJ 244
Quijano, “Matrimonial Property Law Reform in Canada” (1975) 13 Osgoode Hall LJ 381
Robertson, “Matrimonial Property and Haldane’s Case” [1977] NZLJ 19
Rose, “Women and Property: Gaining and Losing Ground” (1992) 78 VLR 421
Sackville, “The Emerging Australian Law of Matrimonial Property” (1970) 7 Melbourne University LR 353
Schnurr, “Estate Matters and the Family Law Act – A Seven-year Retrospective” (1993) 13 E & TJ 28
Schroeder, “Matrimonial Property Law Reform: Evaluating the Alternatives” (1977) 11 UBC LR 24
Seplowitz, “Transfers Prior to Marriage and the Uniform Probate Code’s Redesigned Elective Share – Why the Partnership is not yet Complete” (1991) 25 Ind LR 1
Sherrin, “Disinheritance of a Spouse: A Comparative Study of the Law in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland” (1980) 31 Northern Ireland LQ 21
Sim, “Husband and Wife: The New Look as to Ownership of Property” [1968] NZLJ 182 (Part 1); 213 (Part 2); 227 (Part 3); 248 (Part 4); 274 (Part 5)
Sim, “New Matrimonial and Family Legislation (1968)” [1969] NZLJ 41
Temkin, “Property Relations During Marriage in England and Ontario” (1981) 30 I&CLQ 190
Turano, “UPC Section 2–201: Equal Treatment of Spouses” (1992) 55 Albany
LR 983
Ullrich, “The Reform of Matrimonial Property Law in England during the Nineteenth Century” (1977) 9 VUWLR 13
Waggoner, “Marital Property Rights in Transition” (1994) 59 Missouri LR 21
Waggoner, “The Multiple-Marriage Society and Spousal Rights under the Revised Uniform Probate Code” (1991) 76 Iowa
LR 223
Wagner, “California’s New Community Property Law – Its Effect on Interspousal Mismanagement Litigation” (1974) 5 Pacific LJ 723
Whitebread, “The Uniform Probate Code’s Nod to the Partnership Theory of Marriage: The 1990 Elective Share Revisions” (1992) 11 Probate LJ 125
Wright, “A Fair Share in the Assets – The Position of the Surviving Spouse” (1990) 2 Aust J Fam Law 93
Younger, “Marital Regimes” (1981) 67 Cornell LR 1
Zelder, “The Economic Analysis of the Effect of No-Fault Divorce Law on the Divorce Rate” (1993) 16 Harvard J Law and Public Policy 241
Papers
Atkin, “Personal Obligations of Support: Options and Discussion” (Department of Justice, April 1992)
Gibson, “Matrimonial Property – Is there Equality under the Matrimonial Property Act?” (Papers of the Family Court Conference, The Family Court Ten Years On, Auckland, 1991), 81
Lee, “Family Court Custody and Access Research Report 2: A Survey of Parents who have Obtained a Dissolution” (Policy and Research Division, Department of Justice, 1990)
Mahoney, “Gender Bias in Family Law – Deconstructing Husband Privilege” (NZLS Family Law Conference Papers, 1995,
vol 1), 1
Manitoba Association of Women and the Law Incorporated, “Fairness in Family Law” (1994)
Sim, “Matrimonial Property in New Zealand” in Inglis and Mercer (eds), Family Law Centenary Essays (Sweet and Maxwell, Wellington, 1967), 109
Smart, “Marriage, Divorce, and Women’s Economic Dependency: A Discussion of the Politics of Private Maintenance” in Freeman (ed), State, Law and Family (Tavistock, London, 1984), 9
Ullrich, “Matrimonial Property – Is there Equality under the Matrimonial Property Act?” (Papers of the Family Court Conference, The Family Court Ten Years On, Auckland, 1991), 97
Ullrich, “Reform of Matrimonial Property Law” (Department of Justice, April 1992)
Weitzman and Dixon, “The Transformation of Marriage through No-Fault Divorce: The Case of the United States” in Eekelaar and Katz (eds), Marriage and Cohabitation in Contemporary Societies (Butterworths, Toronto, 1980), 143
Reports
Alberta Institute of Law Research and Reform, Towards Reform of the Law Relating to Cohabitation Outside Marriage (1987) Issues Paper No 2
Alberta Institute of Law Research and Reform, Towards Reform of the Law Relating to Cohabitation Outside Marriage (1989) Report No 53
Australian Capital Territory Attorney-General’s Department, A Proposal for Domestic Relationship Legislation in the ACT (Australian Capital Territory, Canberra, 1993) Discussion Paper
Law Commission (England and Wales), Family Law: Distribution on Intestacy (1989) Report No 187
Report of the Legal Services Board/Te Poari Ratonga Ture for the Year Ended 30 June 1994 (1994) AJHR E.7
New South Wales Law Reform Commission, Report on De Facto Relationships (1983) Report No 36
Northern Territory Law Reform Committee, Report on De Facto Relationships (1988) Report No 13
Ontario Law Reform Commission, Report on the Rights and Responsibilities of Cohabitants under the Family Law Act (1993)
Queensland Law Reform Commission, Shared Property (1991) Discussion Paper 36
Queensland Law Reform Commission, De Facto Relationships (1992) Working Paper No 40
Queensland Law Reform Commission, Intestacy Rules (1993) Report No 42
Queensland Law Reform Commission, De Facto Relationships (1993) Report No 44
Scottish Law Commission, The Effects of Cohabitation in Private Law (1990) Discussion Paper No 86
Scottish Law Commission, Report on Family Law (1992) Report No 135
Tasmanian Law Reform Commission, Report on Obligations Arising from De Facto Relationships (1977) Report No 12
Western Australia Parliamentary Select Committee, Report on De Facto Relationships (1990)
Books
Atkin, Living Together Without Marriage (Butterworths, Wellington, 1991)
Eekelaar and Katz, Marriage and Cohabitation in Contemporary Societies (Butterworths, Toronto, 1980)
Foreman and O’Ryan, Guide to the De Facto Relationships Act (NSW) (Butterworths, Sydney, 1985)
Freeman and Lyon, Cohabitation Without Marriage (Gower, Aldershot, 1984)
Articles
Alston, “De Facto Spouses’ Property Dispute: Pasi v Kamana” [1987] NZLJ 75
Astor and Nothdurft, “Report of the New South Wales Law Reform Commission on De Facto Relationships” (1985) 48 MLR 61
Atherton, “De Facto Spouses and Intestacy” (1985) 23 Law Soc J 749
Atkin, “De Facto Relationships and the Law” (1987) 1 FLB 30
Atkin, “De Factos Engaging Our Attention” [1988] NZLJ 12
Bailey-Harris, “Property Disputes Between De Facto Couples: Is Statute the Best Solution?” (1991) 5 Aust J Fam L 221
Bailey-Harris, “Financial Rights in Relationships Outside Marriage: A Decade of Reforms in Australia” (1995) 9 Int J Law and Family 233
Bala, “The Evolving Canadian Definition of the Family: Towards a Pluralistic and Functional Approach” (1994) 8 Int J Law and Family 293
Bradley, “The Development of a Legal Status for Unmarried Cohabitation in Sweden” (1989) 18 Anglo-American LR 322
Bradley, “Marriage, Family, Property and Inheritance in Swedish Law” (1990) 39 I&CLQ 370
Bradley, “Radical Principles and the Legal Institution of Marriage: Domestic Relations Law and Social Democracy in Sweden” (1990) 4 Int J Law and Family 154
Bradley, “Unmarried Cohabitation in Sweden: A Renewed Social Institution” (1990) 11 J Legal Hist 300
Browne, “Family Law – De Facto Relationships – Alteration of Property Interests – What is ‘Just and Equitable’?” (1993) 67 ALJ 232
Cameli, “Extending Family Benefits to Gay Men and Lesbian Women” (1992) 68 Chicago-Kent Law Review 447
Charlesworth, “Domestic Contributions to Matrimonial Property” (1989) 3 Aust J Fam L 147
Chisholm and others, “De Facto Property Decisions in New South Wales: Emerging Patterns and Policies” (1991) 5 Aust J Fam L 241
Cho, “The De Facto Relationships Act 1984 (NSW): Blurring the Distinction Between De Jure Marriages and De Facto Relationships” (1991) 5 Aust J Fam L 19
Clarke, “The Family Home: Intention and Agreement” [1992] Fam Law 72
Cooke, “Reliance and Estoppel: Wayling v Jones (1993) 69 P & CR 170 (CA)” (1995) 111 LQR 389
Cooke, “The Place of Equity and Equitable Doctrines in the Contemporary Common Law World – A New Zealand Perspective” in Waters (ed), Equity, Fiduciaries and Trusts 1993 (Carswell, Toronto, 1993), 35
Cull, “De Facto Couples and Family Law – What Protection?” (New Zealand Suffrage Centennial Women’s Law Conference Papers, Wellington, 1993), 255
Davis, “Wayling v Jones: Estoppel – Reliance and Remedy” [1995] The Conveyancer 409
Dervan, “Quasi-Matrimonial Property Division and Judicial Alchemy” (1984) 5 Auckland University LR 1
Dixon, “Acquiring an Interest in Another’s Property: Lloyd’s Bank plc v Rosset [1990] 2 WLR 867 (HL)” [1990] CLJ 38
Eekelaar, “A Woman’s Place – A Conflict between Law and Social Values” [1987] The Conveyancer 93
Eskridge, “A History of Same-Sex Marriage” (1993) 79 Virginia LR 1419
Evans, “De Facto Property Disputes: The Drama Continues” (1987) 1 Aust J Fam
L 234
Farquhar, “Note – Peter v Beblow” [1993] 72 Can Bar Rev 538
Fawcett, “Taking the Middle Path: Recent Swedish Legislation Grants Minimal Property Rights to Unmarried Cohabitants” (1990) 24 Family LQ 179
Gardner, “Rethinking Family Property” (1993) 109 LQR 263
Harvey, “The Property Rights of De Facto Partners – Some Proposals for Legislative Reform” [1989] NZLJ 167
Hayes, “Constructive Trusts, Proprietary Estoppel and Wavering Equity” (1993) 137 SJ 606
Hayton, “Constructive Trusts of Homes – A Bold Approach” (1993) 109 LQR 485
Henson, “A Comparative Analysis of Same-sex Partnership Protections: Recommendations for American Reform” (1993) 7 Int J Law and Family 282
Howman, “Critique of Justice Hardie Boys’ Paper” (1995) 25 VUWLR 43
Kovacs, “De Facto Property Rights in Victoria” (1990) 64 Law Inst J 159
Lawson-Cruttenden and Odutola, “Constructive Trusts – A Practical Guide” [1995] Fam Law 560
McCamus and Taman, “Rathwell v Rathwell: Matrimonial Property, Resulting and Constructive Trusts” (1978) 16 Osgoode Hall LJ 741
McClean, “Matrimonial Property – Canadian Common Law Style” (1981) 31 University of Toronto LJ 363
McMorland, “Trusts and the Property Problem of De Facto Couples” (1985) 11 NZULR 275
Maxton, “De Facto Spouses and the Presumption of Advancement” (1986) 12 NZULR 79
Maxton, “Property Rights and De Facto Relationships” (1987) 4 BCB 94; (1987) 4 BCB 181
Melton, “Legal Rights of Unmarried Heterosexual and Homosexual Couples and Evolving Definitions of ‘Family’” (1990) 29 J Fam L 497
Munro, “The New Law of Estoppel” (1993) 23 VUWLR 271
Narev, “Unjust Enrichment and De Facto Relationships” (1991) 6 Auckland University LR 504
Neave, “The Constructive Trust as a Remedial Device” (1978) 11 Melbourne University LR 343
Neave, “The New Unconscionability Principle – Property Disputes Between De Facto Partners” (1991) 5 Aust J Fam L 185
Neave, “Living Together – The Legal Effects of the Sexual Division of Labour in Four Common Law Countries” (1991) 17 Monash University LR 14
Neave, “From Difference to Sameness – Law and Women’s Work” (1992) 18 Melbourne University LR 768
Nielson, “Family Rights and the ‘Registered Partnership’ in Denmark” (1990) 4 Int J Law and Family 297
Norrie, “Reproductive Technology, Transsexualism and Homosexuality: New Problems for International Private Law” (1994) 43 I&CLQ 757
Norrie, “Proprietary Rights of Cohabitants” (1995) Jur Rev 209
Parker, “De Facto Property Rights: Time For Change?” (1995) 1 BFLJ 179
Parker, “De Facto Property: A Matter of Human Rights” (1995) 1 BFLJ 280
Parkinson, “Intention, Contribution and Reliance in De Facto Cases” (1991) 5 Aust J Fam L 268
Peart, “A Comparative View of Property Rights in De Facto Relationships: Are We All Driving in the Same Direction?” (1988) 7 Otago LR 100
Pederson, “Denmark: Homosexual Marriages and New Rules Regarding Separation and Divorce” (1991) 30 J Fam L 289
Pepperell (ed), “De Facto Property Rights Revisited” [1994] 17 TCL 47/1
Rickett, “Causes of Action and Remedies – Getting it Clear” [1994] NZLJ 207
Riley, “The Property Rights of Home-Makers under General Law: Bryson v Bryant” (1994) 16 Sydney LR 412
Roberts, “Will Drafting and Property Ownership, Bearing in Mind Cohabitees and Gay and Lesbian Couples” [1992] Fam Law 77
Rotherham, “The Contribution Interest in Quasi-Matrimonial Property Disputes” (1991) 4 Canterbury LR 407
Rusk, “Same-Sex Spousal Benefits and the Evolving Conception of Family” (1993) 52 University Toronto LR 170
Slatter, “Constructive Trust – Need for Case-by-Case Approach” (1988) 5 BCB 32
Stamps, “Domestic Partnership Legislation: Recognising Non-Traditional Families” (1992) 19 Southern University LR 441
Vaver, “The Legal Effects of De Facto Relationships” [1976] NZ Rec LR 161
Veitch, “The Essence of Marriage – A Comment on the Homosexual Challenge” (1976) 5 Anglo-American LR 41
Wade, “Discretionary Property Scheme for De Facto Spouses – The Experiment in New South Wales” (1987) 2 Aust J Fam L 75
Watts, “Restitution: The Status of the Unjust Enrichment Concept, and its Application to Failed Domestic Relationships” [1989] NZ Rec LR 386
Watts, “Restitution: De Facto Relationships” [1994] NZ Rec LR 432
Webb, “Trusts of Matrimonial Property” (1976) 92 LQR 489
Wylie, “Computing Shares in the Family Home” [1995] Fam L 633–636
Papers
Atkin and Cull, “De Facto Property Law, Equity and the Unmarried Couple” (Papers of the Family Court Conference, The Family Court Ten Years On, Auckland, 1991), 136
Bailey-Harris, De Facto Relationships: Searching For Justice Nationwide (28th Australian Legal Convention Papers, September 1993), 166–174
Cull, “De Facto Couples and Family Law – What Protection?” (New Zealand Suffrage Centennial Women’s Law Conference Papers, 1993), 259
Hughes and Ivory, “De Facto Property” (NZLS Seminar Paper, September–October 1992)
Leonard, “De Facto Law Reform and its Effects on Women” (LLM Paper, University of Canterbury, 1990)
Leslie, “The Law on De Facto Property – Still in Need of Reform” (LLB(Hons) Paper, University of Otago, 1994)
McLachlin, “A Canadian Perspective” in Waters (ed), Equity, Fiduciaries and Trusts 1993 (Carswell, Toronto, 1993), 47
Mason, “An Australian Perspective” in Waters (ed), Equity, Fiduciaries and Trusts 1993 (Carswell, Toronto, 1993), 1
Neave, “Three Approaches to Family Property Disputes – Intention/Belief, Unjust Enrichment and Unconscionability” in Youdan (ed), Equity, Fiduciaries and Trusts (Carswell, Toronto, 1989), 255
O’Brian and Suri, “De Facto Property Rights” (New Zealand Suffrage Centennial Women’s Law Conference Papers, 1993), 79
O’Regan and Slatter, “Current Issues in Shared Ownership” (NZLS Seminar Paper, November 1995)
Parker, “De Facto Property Rights: A Proposal for Reform” (LLM Paper, VUW, 1994)
Reports
Alberta Institute of Law Research and Reform, Family Relief (1978) Report 29
Attorney-General’s Law Reform Advisory Council, The Desirability of Reforming Aspects of Part IV of the Administration and Probate Act 1958 (Vic) (July 1994) Discussion Paper
Hong Kong Law Reform Commission, Report on the Law of Wills, Intestate Succession and Provision for Deceased Persons’ Families and Dependants (1987) Report on Topic No 15
Law Commission (England and Wales), Family Law: Second Report on Family Property: Family Provision on Death (1974) Report No 61
Law Reform Commission of British Columbia, Report on Statutory Succession Rights (1983) Report No 70
Law Reform Committee of Western Australia, The Protection to be Given to the Family and Dependants of a Deceased Person (1970) Report on Project No 2
Manitoba Law Reform Commission, The Testators Family Maintenance Act (1985) Report No 63
New South Wales Law Reform Commission, Report on Testator’s Family Maintenance and Guardianship of Infants Act 1916 (1977) Report No 28
Ontario Law Reform Commission, Report on Family Law: Part IV Family Property Law (1974)
Queensland Law Reform Commission, Uniform Succession Laws For Australian States and Territories: Family Provision (1995) Issues Paper No 2, Working Paper 47
Government Child Support Review Working Party, Report of the Working Party on the Child Support Review 1994 (1994)
Books
Amighetti, The Law of Dependant’s Relief in British Columbia (Carswell, Toronto, 1991)
Davern Wright, Testator’s Family Maintenance in Australia and New Zealand (3rd ed, Law Book Co, Sydney, 1974)
De Groot and Nickel, Family Provision in Australia and New Zealand (Butterworths, Sydney, 1993)
Dickey, Family Provision after Death (Law Book Co, Sydney, 1992)
Oughton (ed), Tyler’s Family Provision (2nd ed, Professional Books Limited, Abingdon, 1984)
Articles
Atherton, “New Zealand’s Testator’s Family Maintenance Act of 1900 – The Stouts, the Women’s Movement and Political Compromise” (1990) 7 Otago LR 202
Bale, “Limitation on Testamentary Dispositions in Canada” (1964) 42 Canadian Bar Review 367
Bates, “Housekeepers, Companions and Family Provision – A Comparative Interlude” [1993] The Conveyancer 270
Cadwallader, “A Mistresses’ Charter?” [1980] The Conveyancer 46
Cahn, “Restraints on Disinheritance” (1936) 85 University of Pennsylvania
LR 139
Caldwell, “Family Protection Act 1955 – Moral Duty and Adult Children” [1982] NZLJ 215
Clive, “Family Law Reform in Scotland” (1989) Jur Rev 133
Cooney, “Succession and Judicial Discretion in Ireland: The Section 117 Cases” (1980) 15 Irish Jur 62
Dainow, “Limitations on Testamentary Freedom in England” (1940) 25 Cornell
LR 337
Dainow, “Restricted Testation in Australia, New Zealand and Canada” (1938) 36 Mich LR 1107
Flannery, “Family Protection: Coach and Four Through an Act of Parliament” [1978] NZLJ 451
Fratcher, “Protection of the Family Against Disinheritance in American Law” (1965) 14 I&CLQ 293
Gold, Breslauer, Kahn-Freund and Robson, “Freedom of Testation: The Inheritance (Family Provision) Bill” (1938) 4 MLR 296
Goodman, “The Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975” (1993) 137 SJ 533
Gordon, “Conflict Between Limitations on Testamentary Power by Statute and Contract” (1941) 29 Canadian Bar
Review 603
Grainer, “Is the Present Concept of a ‘Moral Duty’ a Satisfactory Basis for Determinations under the Family Protection Act 1955?” (1994) 24 VUWLR 141
Green, “The Englishwoman’s Castle – Inheritance and Private Property Today” (1988) 51 MLR 187
Guest, “Family Provision and the Legitima Portio” (1957) 73 LQR 74
Harrap and Allardice, “The Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975” (1993) 137 SJ 41
High, “The Tension between Testamentary Freedom and Parental Support Obligations: A Comparison Between the United States and Great Britain” (1984) 17 Cornell International LJ 321
Hoser, “Family Provision for Non-spouse Dependants” (1984) 14 Fam L 171
Hudson and Barbalich, “Succession Law In France and Italy” (1991) 135 SJ 1032
Jordan, “Limitations on the Power of Testamentary Disposition” (1908) 5 Commonwealth LR 97
Keeton and Gower, “Freedom of Testation in English Law” (1934) 20 Iowa LR 326
Kelly Lanning Turner, “Succession of Lauga: Amendments to Forced Heirship Article Violate Louisiana Constitution” (1994) 68 Tulane LR 1390
Laufer, “Flexible Restraints on Testamentary Freedom – A Report on Decedents’ Family Maintenance Legislation” (1955) 69 Harv LR 277
McMurray, “Liberty of Testation and Some Modern Testations Thereon” (1919) 14 Illinois LR 96
Miller, “The Reform of the Law Relating to Financial Provision and Matrimonial Property” (1980) 15 Cambrian LR 73
Miller, “Provision for a Surviving Spouse” (1986) 102 LQR 445
Miller, “Provision for Adult Children under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975” [1995] The Conveyancer 22
Naresh, “Dependants’ Applications under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975" (1980) 96 LQR 534
Peart, “Awards for Children under the Family Protection Act 1955” (1995) 1
BFLJ 225
Peart, “The Direction of the Family Protection Act 1955” [1994] NZ Rec
LR 193
Preble, “Family Violence and Family Property: A Proposal for Reform” (1995) 13 Law and Inequality 401
Samuels, “Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975” (1976) 39
MLR 183
Scannall and Venn, “Inheritance Law the French Way” (1993) 90 Gazette 25
Shammas, “The English Law of Inheritance and its Transfer to the Colonies” (1987) 31 Am J Legal History 145
Sherrin, “Application by Dependants under the Family Provision Legislation” (1982) 33 Northern Ireland LQ 162
Sherrin, “Disinheritance of a Spouse: A Comparative Study of the Law in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland” (1980) 31 Northern Ireland LQ 21
Tobin, “The Family Protection Act 1955: Expanding the Categories of Eligible Applicant” (1994) 16 NZULR 1
Unger, “The Inheritance Act and the Family” (1943) 6 MLR 215
Voyce, “The Impact of the Testator’s Family Maintenance Legislation as Law and Ideology on the Family Farm” (1993) 7 Aust J Fam L 191
Yoder, “British Inheritance Legislation: Discretionary Distribution at Death” (1985) 8 Boston College Int & Comp LR 205
Papers
Nyein, “The Family Protection Act 1955: Its Effect and Operation in Recent Times” (LLM Research Paper, VUW, 1981)
Reports
Property Law and Equity Reform Committee, Working Paper on Proposals for Reform of the Law Reform (Testamentary Promises) Act 1949 (circa 1974)
Books
Birks, An Introduction to the Law of Restitution (Rev ed, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1989)
Birks, Restitution – The Future (The Federation Press, Sydney, 1992)
Ford and Lee, Principles of the Law of Trusts (Law Book Co, Sydney, 1983)
Goff and Jones, The Law of Restitution (4th ed, Sweet and Maxwell, London, 1993)
Hayton (ed), Underhill and Hayton: Law of Trusts and Trustees (14th ed, Butterworths, London, 1987)
Martin (ed), Hanbury and Maudsley: Modern Equity (13th ed, Stevens, London, 1989)
Meagher and Gummow (eds), Jacobs Law of Trusts in Australia (5th ed, Butterworths, Sydney, 1986)
Oakley, Constructive Trusts (2nd ed, Sweet and Maxwell, London, 1987)
Pettit, Equity and the Law of Trusts (6th ed, Butterworths, London, 1989)
Waters, Law of Trusts in Canada (2nd ed, Carswell, Toronto, 1984)
Articles
Beckner Sloan, “Quantum Meruit: Residual Equity in Law” (1992) 42 DePaul LR 399
Burrows, “Free Acceptance and the Law of Restitution” (1988) 104 LQR 576
Campbell, “Promises to Make Testamentary Provision” (1947) 23 NZLJ 221
Davey, “Testamentary Promises” (1988) 8 Legal Studies 92
Davis, “The Law Reform (Testamentary Promises) Act 1949 (NZ)” (1950) 13 MLR 353
Enonchong, “Title Claims and Illegal Transactions” (1995) 111 LQR 135
Allen Farnsworth, “Promises to make Gifts” [1995] Am J of Comparative L 359
Garner, “The Role of Subjective Benefit in the Law of Restitution” (1990) 10 OJLS 42
Millet, “Equity – The Road Ahead” (1995–1996) 6 King’s College LJ 1
Peart, “Re Welch: The Boundaries of the Testamentary Promises Act” [1991] NZLJ 77
Scott, “Restitution and the Argument of Subjective Devaluation: When is an Enrichment not an Enrichment?” (1993) 15 NZULR 247
Spencer, “Signature, Consent, and the Rule in L’Estrange v Graucob” (1973) 32 Cambridge LJ 104
Stoljar, “Promise, Expectation and Agreement” (1988) 47 Cambridge LJ 193
Sweatman, “Claims for Compensation for Services Rendered” (1994) 14 E & TJ 143
Wade, “Restitution for Benefits Conferred without Request” (1966) 19 Vanderbilt
LR 1183
Papers
Cawthorn, “Testamentary Promises – A Restitutionary Analysis” (LLB(Hons) Paper, University of Auckland, March 1980)
Coote, “Testamentary Promises Jurisdiction in New Zealand” in Northey (ed), A G Davis Essays in Law (Butterworths, Wellington, 1965), 1
Reports
California Law Revision Commission, Recommendation Relating to Non-Probate Transfers (1982) 16 Cal L Revision Commn Reports 129
Law Reform Commission of Western Australia, Report on Joint Tenancies and Tenancies in Common (1994) Project No 78
National Working Party on Mediation, Guidelines for Family Mediation – Developing Services for Aotearoa/New Zealand (Butterworths, Wellington, 1996)
Books
Astor and Chinkin, Dispute Resolution in Australia (Butterworths, Sydney, 1992)
Cain and Curran, Dobbie’s Probate and Administration Practice (4th ed, Butterworths, Wellington, 1986)
Beck and others (eds), McGechan on Procedure (Brooker’s, Wellington, 1988)
McLeod, Family Dispute Resolution – Litigation and its Alternatives (Carswell, Toronto, 1987)
National Working Party on Mediation, Guidelines for Family Mediation – Developing Services for Aotearoa/New Zealand (Butterworths, Wellington, 1996)
Articles
Beck, “Tracing Orders and the Family Protection Act 1955” [1992] NZ Rec
LR 322
Bonfield and Poos, “The Development of The Deathbed Transfer in Medieval English Manor Courts” (1988) 47 CLJ 404
Brierley, “Mutual Wills – Blackpool Illuminations” (1995) 58 MLR 95
Broaden, “Undue Influence as a Basis for Opposing a Grant of Probate is a Particularly Difficult Ground to Prove” (1994) 68 Law Institute J 57
Browder, “Giving or Leaving – What is a Will?” (1977) 75 Mich LR 845
Carden, “Family Protection and Mediation” (1986) 1 FLB 66
Corbin, “Consider the ‘Win-Win’ of Mediation in Estate Disputes” (1995) 14 E & TJ 365
Dickey, “A Question of Priorities: Wives or Unsecured Creditors?” (1992) 6 Aust J Fam L 229
Flannery, “Family Protection: Coach and Four through an Act of Parliament” [1978] NZLJ 451
Francis and Baker, “Mediation: Where do you Draw the Line?” (1993) 23 Fam L 482
Family Court Mediation Section Melbourne Registry, “Mediation in the Family Court – An Overview of the Model” (1994) 8 Aust J Fam L 58
Gulliver and Tilson, “Classification of Gratuitous Transfers” (1941) 51 Yale LJ 1
Hardingham, “Schaefer v Schuhmann: Promisee v Dependant” (1972) 10 University Western Australia LR 115
Harris, “The Mediation of Testamentary Disputes” (1994) 5 Australian Disputes Resolution J 222
Juristor, “Contract to Leave Property by Will” (1956) 32 NZLJ 332
Langbein, “The Non-Probate Revolution and the Future of the Law of Succession” (1984) 97 Harv LR 1108
Langbein, “Will Contests” (1993) 103 Yale LJ 2039
Lee, “Contracts to Make Wills” (1971) 87 LQR 358
McCouch, “Will-substitutes Under the Revised Uniform Probate Code” (1993) 58 Brooklyn LR 1123
McGovern, “The Payable-on-Death Account and other Will Substitutes” (1972) 67 Northwestern University LR 7
Martin, “Comparative Analysis Between the Uniform Probate Code and Michigan Elective Share Systems: The Time is Ripe to Adopt the Augmented Estate Concept in Michigan” (1992) 69 University of Detroit Mercy LR 381
Maxton, “The Nature of a Beneficiary’s Interest Pending the Administration of an Estate” [1992] The Conveyancer 92
Meierding, “The Impact of Cultural and Religious Diversity in the Divorce Mediation Process” (1992) 9 Mediation Quarterly 297
Pawlowski, “Death-Bed Gifts” (1994) 144 NLJ 48
Phegan, “The Family Mediation System: An Art of Distributions” (1995) 40 McGill
LJ 365
Rosenberg and Folberg, “Alternative Dispute Resolution: An Empirical Analysis” (1994) 46 Stanford LR 1487
Schnurr, “Laidlaw and Kirsh, Practice and Evidence in Estate Litigation” (1992) 11 E & TJ 250
Schwebel and others, “Divorce Mediation: Four Models and Their Assumptions About Change in Parties’ Positions” (1994) 11 Mediation Quarterly 211
Sheppard, “Contracts to Make Wills and the Family Protection Act 1955: Is the Promisee a Creditor or a Beneficiary?” (1985) 15 VUWLR 157
Sparkes, “Death-Bed Gifts of Land” (1992) 43 Northern Ireland LQ 35
Spiller, “Disputes Resolution in the New Zealand Disputes Tribunals” (1993) 4 Aust Dispute Resolution J 289
Sutton, “Ousting the Family Protection Act Jurisdiction” [1977] NZLJ 57
Wade, “Tools from a Mediator’s Toolbox: Reflections on Matrimonial Property Disputes” (1996) 7 Aust Dispute Resolution J 93
Whiting, “Family Disputes, Non-family Disputes, and Mediation Success” (1994) 11 Mediation Quarterly 247
Papers
Knight, “Claims against Deceased Estates” (NZLS Family Law Conference Papers, October 1995, vol 2), 65
Wade, “Mediation” (Law Commission Seminar, 16 May 1994)
NZLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/other/nzlc/pp/PP24/PP24-Bibliogr.html