![]() |
Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
New Zealand Law Commission - Government Responses |
Last Updated: 18 September 2016
Summary of the Government’s Response to the Law Commission’s
Review of the War Pensions Act 1954
Chapter 1 — Principles
|
||
Rec No
|
Law Commission Recommendation
|
Government Response
|
R1
|
The purpose of the new legislation should include:
• to provide veterans with fair entitlements;
• to promote equal treatment of equal claims;
• to promote a benevolent approach to claims; and
• to ensure that the scheme is administered efficiently.
|
Accept
|
R2
|
The new legislation should require periodic review at least every five
years.
|
Accept in principle
Legislation to be reviewed periodically as required
|
Chapter 2 — Scheme Structure
|
||
Rec No
|
Law Commission Recommendation
|
Government Response
|
R3
|
The new system should create two separate schemes for different veterans
depending on date of service either through the introduction
of two separate
Acts or as a single Act with distinct parts applying to Scheme One and Scheme
Two. Scheme One would apply to serving
personnel with service prior to 1 April
1974. Scheme Two would apply to those with qualifying operational service from 1
April 1974.
|
Accept
|
R4
|
If two Acts are introduced, the Scheme One legislation should be entitled
the “Military Entitlements Act” and the Scheme
Two legislation the
“Armed Forces Rehabilitation and Compensation Act”
|
Not progressed
Advice from the Parliamentary Counsel Office was that one piece of
legislation should be introduced.
|
Chapter 3 — Service Eligibility
|
||
Rec No
|
Law Commission Recommendation
|
Government Response
|
R5
|
The new legislation should cover the same types of service currently
covered by the War Pensions Act 1954, that is, any service in
the New Zealand
armed forces prior to 1 April 1974 and qualifying operational service on or
after 1 April 1974.
|
Accept
|
R6
|
Scheme One should also cover:
• former members of the New
Zealand mercantile marine during World War Two; and
|
Accept
|
R7
|
Scheme Two should also cover civilian members of the New Zealand Defence
Force who serve in qualifying operational service.
|
Accept
|
R8
|
All wars and emergencies currently covered by the War Pensions Act 1954
should be declared qualifying operational service.
|
Accept
|
R9
|
The Minister of Veterans’ Affairs, following consultation with the
Chief of Defence Force, would have the authority to declare
that a particular
deployment constitutes a qualifying operational service.
|
Accept
|
R10
|
The declaration should be required to specify the period of time and the
locations on land or sea that constitute qualifying operational
service.
|
Accept with amendment
Declaration to include locations in the air where appropriate
|
R11
|
The new legislation should set out a list of factors to be taken into
consideration when deciding if a deployment should be declared
qualifying
operational service. This list should be:
(a) the operational threat posed to the well-being of personnel by:
|
Accept
|
|
• the activity of stakeholders, factions and security forces,
including military and political activity;
• acts of
terrorism, whether specifically directed at NZDF personnel or not; and
(b) the environmental threat to the health and well-being of personnel due
to:
• water, food and sanitation;
• endemic, epidemic and other diseases of operational importance;
insect, animal and plant hazards;
and
• roads and associated traffic hazards.
|
|
Rec No
|
Law Commission Recommendation
|
Government Response
|
R12
|
If possible, declarations of qualifying operational service should be made
prior to personnel leaving New
Zealand for the deployment.
|
Accept
|
R13
|
The legislation should allow the Minister of Veterans’ Affairs to
declare that a deployment is qualifying operational service
at any time before,
during or after the deployment.
|
Accept
|
R14
|
Declarations of qualifying operational service should be published in the
Gazette and made publicly available on the VANZ website.
|
Accept
|
Chapter 4 — Connection between Service and Impairment
|
||
Rec No
|
Law Commission Recommendation
|
Government Response
|
R15
|
The veterans’ legislation should cover injuries, illnesses and deaths
that are attributable to or have been aggravated by service.
|
Accept
|
R16
|
For an injury or illness to be attributable to service it must
have:
• been caused or contributed to by qualifying
operational service.
|
Accept
|
R17
|
For an injury or illness to be aggravated by service, it must
have:
• been made worse by service; and
|
Accept
|
|
either:
• arisen
during qualifying operational service but was not caused by qualifying
operational service.
|
|
Rec No
|
Law Commission Recommendation
|
Government Response
|
R18
|
Scheme One should continue to exclude from coverage injuries, illnesses or
deaths that occurred while a veteran was a deserter, absent
without leave and
not in receipt of continuous pay, or that resulted from wilful misconduct.
|
Accept
|
R19
|
Scheme Two should exclude from coverage, at the discretion of the General
Manager of VANZ, injuries, illnesses or deaths that are:
• the result of illegal activity;
• self-inflicted (unless suicide or caused by a service-related
psychological impairment);
• smoking-related; or
• due to sexually transmitted infections.
|
Accept
|
Chapter 5 — Evidential Standards and Instruments
|
||
Rec No
|
Law Commission Recommendation
|
Government Response
|
R20
|
The new legislation should include beneficial evidential provisions that
adopt the same level of benevolence towards veterans’
claims as those in
the War Pensions Act 1954. A more beneficial standard of proof should apply to
veterans with service in qualifying
operational service compared with the
standard that applies to service personnel with routine service.
|
Accept
|
R21
|
The legislation should allow for the creation of statements of principles
(SoPs) and presumptive lists, to guide decision-making on
certain relationships
between medical conditions and service.
|
Accept
|
R22
|
SoPs should be a list of the service factors that link a particular
condition with service. Only the factors contained in a SoP should
be able to
link the condition covered by the SoP with service. Different SoPs
|
Accept
|
|
reflecting the appropriate standard of proof should apply to veterans with
qualifying operational service and service personnel with
routine service
|
|
Rec No
|
Law Commission Recommendation
|
Government Response
|
R23
|
The expert medical panel should have the power to adopt or amend
presumptive decision-making instruments.
|
Accept in principle
Dependent on conditions noted in the bilateral instrument to be developed
with Australia
|
R24
|
The new legislation should require that any presumptive decision-making
instruments are based on “sound medical and scientific
research”,
which should be defined.
|
Accept
|
R25
|
The United States’ Committee on Evaluation of the Presumptive
Disability Decision-Making Process for Veterans should be closely
examined and
relevant recommendations incorporated into the process for establishing
presumptive decision-making instruments in New
Zealand.
|
Operational Issue
|
R26
|
A presumptive list should be a list of medical conditions for which there
is a rebuttable presumption that a condition is related
to service based solely
on diagnosis of a condition and service in a particular theatre. The legislation
should set out the degree
of relationship between a service factor and a medical
condition that is sufficient for a presumptive list to apply. The expert medical
panel should examine the United States presumptive rules and the research of the
Institute of Medicine, as well as other evidence,
in determining whether to
establish a presumptive list for the New Zealand system.
|
Accept
|
R27
|
The legislation should allow individual veterans, veterans’ groups
and Veterans’ Affairs New Zealand to refer medical
conditions to the
expert medical panel for consideration of whether presumptive decision-making
rules need to be adopted or reviewed.
|
Accept in principle
Veterans will make application through the veteran’s advisory
board
|
R28
|
The expert medical panel should be able to review and recommend amendment
to any existing decision- making instruments on the basis
of new medical and
scientific evidence.
|
Accept in principle
Dependent on conditions noted in the bilateral instrument to be developed
with Australia
|
Rec No
|
Law Commission Recommendation
|
Government Response
|
R29
|
The new legislation should allow requests for review of decision-making
instruments from individual veterans, veterans’ organisations
or VANZ to
be considered by a review committee within three months of the decision to adopt
or amend a decision-making instrument.
The grounds on which a review could be
requested should be that the instrument is not based on sound medical and
scientific research
or that the sound medical and scientific research is
insufficient to justify the making of the instrument.
|
Accept with amendment
The review process will be through the Australian Repatriation Medical
Authority
|
R30
|
The new legislation should require the appointment of a permanent chair of
the review committee who is a medical or scientific expert.
The Minister of
Veterans’ Affairs should be required to appoint up to two additional
reviewers, being medical or scientific
experts in fields relevant to the medical
condition being examined, when a review request is made. The review committee
should be
required to make a declaration in writing to give reasons for its
decision and be able to make recommendations to the expert medical
panel
regarding that condition.
|
Not progressed
The review process will be through the Australian Repatriation Medical
Authority
|
Chapter 6 — Measuring Impairment
|
||
Rec No
|
Law Commission Recommendation
|
Government Response
|
R31
|
The new legislation should provide that the following tools are used to
determine the level of whole-person impairment caused by service-related
injury
or illness:
• American Medical Association Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent
Impairment (AMA Guides); and
• a supplement specific to this scheme.
|
Accept
|
R32
|
The supplement to the AMA Guides should be developed by VANZ in conjunction
with the expert medical panel.
|
Accept
|
R33
|
Assessments of service-related impairments should be carried out by VANZ
approved assessors.
|
Accept
|
Chapter 7 — Decision Making
|
||
Rec No
|
Law Commission Recommendation
|
Government Response
|
R34
|
The authority for the administration of the legislation and overall
decision-making should be vested in the
General Manager of VANZ.
|
Accept
|
R35
|
The new legislation should include a section setting out the functions of
the General Manager. These should
|
Accept
|
|
include:
|
|
Rec No
|
Law Commission Recommendation
|
Government Response
|
R36
|
The General Manager should be provided with the power to correct
administrative errors.
|
Accept
|
R37
|
The General Manager should be responsible for determining all claims for
all assistance and entitlements, including impairment compensation.
The new Act
should provide the General Manager with the authority to delegate this
decision-making power to any employee of the department,
and potentially to
other departments.
|
Accept
|
R38
|
The new legislation should set out the following details relating to claims
for any entitlement: (a) a claimant must make application
for an
entitlement;
(b) applications for entitlements are to be made in writing on a form
specified by the department and must contain all of the necessary
information;
(c) the date of lodgement is the date the application form is received by
the department; (d) the General Manager has the responsibility
to make decisions
in a timely manner; and (e) when being advised of a decision, a claimant must be
advised of any review rights.
|
Accept
|
R39
|
We recommend that the following types of decisions are covered by the right
of review: (a) the eligibility of a veteran for
any entitlement or
assistance under the legislation; (b) the relationship of any medical
condition to a claimant’s service;
(c) the claimant’s service eligibility; and
(d) the degree of impairment caused by a medical condition.
|
Accept in principle
To be discussed with the Ministry of Justice during drafting
|
R40
|
A person whose claim for impairment compensation is declined on the basis
that the impairment is not related to service and presumptive
decision-making
instruments did not apply to the decision should be able
|
Accept with amendment
Reviews of claims not
|
|
to request to have their claim reviewed by a review panel.
|
related to service will be reviewed by a panel; all other reviews to
by
undertaken by a VANZ
review officer
|
Rec No
|
Law Commission Recommendation
|
Government Response
|
R41
|
Review panels should be made up of one VANZ reviewer and one reviewer
nominated by the RNZRSA. Both reviewers should be suitably qualified,
with
either legal or medical expertise. If the reviewers disagree, the General
Manager of VANZ should be responsible for the overall
decision.
|
Accept
|
R42
|
If a person disagrees with the level at which impairment compensation has
been awarded, this review of the level of impairment is
to be carried out by a
medical assessor trained in using the AMA Guides. A VANZ medical reviewer should
then provide a decision based
on both the original medical assessment and the
review assessment.
|
Accept
|
R43
|
The review of any other type of decision, including impairment compensation
decisions based on presumptive decision-making instruments,
should be made by
VANZ.
|
Accept
|
R44
|
The legislation should provide that requests for the review of any decision
regarding an entitlement should be made in writing within
six months of the
original decision.
|
Accept
|
R45
|
Reviewers should be required to provide notification in writing of their
decision and the reasons for it. Claimants should also be
advised of any right
of appeal to the appeal tribunal.
|
Accept
|
R46
|
The War Pensions Appeal Board should be replaced with a new independent
tribunal, named the Veterans’ Appeal Tribunal.
|
Not progressed
The Ministry of Justice supports the proposal that the War Pensions Appeal
Board be retained as the appeal body.
|
R47
|
In order for an appeal of a decision to be heard, the claimant should first
have the decision reviewed. Both the claimant and VANZ
should have the right to
appeal a decision of a review panel to the Veterans’ Appeal Tribunal
within six months of the review
decision. The Veterans’ Appeal Tribunal
would have the power to uphold or overturn the original decision.
|
Accept with amendment
Decisions of the review panel to be appealed to the War Pensions
Appeal
|
|
|
Board
|
Rec No
|
Law Commission Recommendation
|
Government Response
|
R48
|
The Ministry of Justice, through the Tribunals Unit, should provide
administrative support to the Veterans’ Appeal Tribunal.
|
Not progressed
The appeal body will remain with VANZ
|
R49
|
Appointments to the Veterans’ Appeal Tribunal should be independent
and merit-based. The appointment process should be open
and give the opportunity
for the appointing authority to assess candidates’ abilities.
|
Not progressed
The Tribunal is not being introduced
|
R50
|
The Minister of Justice should recommend appointments after consultation
with the Minister of Veterans’ Affairs. The responsibility
for appointing
members should be with the Governor-General on recommendation of the Minister of
Justice.
|
Not progressed
The Tribunal is not being introduced
|
R51
|
Members of the Veterans’ Appeal Tribunal should be appointed for a
fixed term of three years and the chair should have a fixed
term of five years.
The legislation should set out limited grounds for termination of appointment
allowing removal on the basis of
“just cause”.
|
Not progressed
The Tribunal is not being introduced
|
R52
|
The Veterans’ Appeal Tribunal should have two or three members
sitting at each hearing. It should be necessary for the chair
to have legal
expertise. The current requirement that some of the members should be medically
qualified should be retained. The nomination
of a medical member by the RNZRSA
should be retained.
|
Not progressed
The Tribunal is not being introduced
|
R53
|
The Veterans’ Appeal Tribunal should be required to conduct hearings
with as little formality as is consistent with a fair and
efficient
process.
|
Not progressed
The Tribunal is not being introduced
|
R54
|
The Veterans’ Appeal Tribunal should not be bound by legal forms or
rules of evidence. If a provision that the tribunal is to
make decisions based
on the substantial merits and justice of a case is included, the legislation
should clearly state the circumstances
when the application of strict legal
technicalities can be relaxed and to what extent.
|
Not progressed
The Tribunal is not being introduced
|
R55
|
The Veterans’ Appeal Tribunal should have the power to call and
examine witnesses, and to require the production of papers,
documents, records
and things for inspection by the tribunal. These powers should be
|
Not progressed
|
|
set out in the legislation.
|
The Tribunal is not being introduced
|
Rec No
|
Law Commission Recommendation
|
Government Response
|
R56
|
The tribunal should be required to provide reasons for decisions in
writing.
|
Not progressed
The Tribunal is not being introduced
|
R57
|
The tribunal should have the following powers:
(a) to summon witnesses, administer an oath or affirmation and take sworn
evidence; (b) to require parties and witnesses to produce
information and
documents;
(c) to require the disclosure of information between the parties to
proceedings; and
(d) to exclude people when they are abusive or disruptive and generally
maintain order during proceedings.
|
Not progressed
The Tribunal is not being introduced
|
R58
|
There should be a presumption that hearings of the Veterans’ Appeal
Tribunal are closed.
|
Not progressed
The Tribunal is not being introduced
|
R59
|
Decisions of the Veterans’ Appeal Tribunal that have value as
precedents should be published on the VANZ
website.
|
Not progressed
The Tribunal is not being introduced
|
R60
|
The Veterans’ Appeal Tribunal should be given limited powers to award
costs.
|
Not progressed
The Tribunal is not being introduced
|
R61
|
The legislation should allow appeals from decisions of the Veterans’
Appeals Tribunal to the High Court on matters of law only.
|
Accept with amendment
No Veterans’ Appeal Tribunal; equivalent body to be the War Pensions
Appeal Board
|
Rec No
|
Law Commission Recommendation
|
Government Response
|
R62
|
The General Manager of VANZ should have the power to allow reconsideration
of previously declined impairment compensation claims in
the following
situations:
(a) where an administrative error has materially affected the original
decision (“administrative error” should be defined
to exclude
contended errors relating to the substance of the decision, and should include
only errors relating to missing or incorrect
information relating to service or
diagnosis of a condition);
(b) where a presumptive decision-making rule (such as a presumptive list or
SoP) has been introduced or amended, and the original
claim would have been
materially affected by the rule; and
(c) where a new declaration of qualifying operational service has been
made, and the original claim would have been materially affected
by the
rule.
|
Accept
|
R63
|
In the case where a previously declined claim is reconsidered and accepted,
the commencement date of the pension should be the date
of the original
application for that medical condition.
|
Accept
|
R64
|
Initial decisions on entitlement to a Veteran’s Pension should be
made by the Ministry of Social Development, with VANZ advising
on whether the
service eligibility is met. If a veteran disagrees with a decision relating to
their service eligibility, the decision
should be reviewed by VANZ reviewers. An
appeal on the service eligibility decision should be to the Veterans’
Appeal Tribunal.
For all other aspects of the Veteran’s Pension, claimants
should under the Social Security Act 1964 be able to request reviews
of the
decisions from a benefits review committee and appeal to the Social Security
Appeal Authority.
|
Accept with amendment
Service eligibility decisions to be appealed to the War Pensions Appeal
Board
|
Chapter 8 — Administration
|
||
Rec No
|
Law Commission Recommendation
|
Government Response
|
R65
|
The new legislation should require that a veteran who is receiving
assistance under veterans’ legislation be given a case manager.
|
Accept with amendment
All veterans will have a case manager, however this won’t be set down
in the legislation
|
R66
|
The War Pensions Medical Research Trust Fund should be renamed the Veterans
’Medical Research Trust
Fund. Administration, including investment, of the fund should be carried
out by VANZ.
|
Accept
|
Rec No
|
Law Commission Recommendation
|
Government Response
|
R67
|
The new legislation should establish an expert medical panel, with the
following roles:
• reviewing international medical and scientific research relating to
the impacts of service on veterans’
health;
• formulating presumptive decision-making instruments;
• commissioning research;
• providing
information to medical practitioners about the treatment of veterans; and
|
Accept in principle
The Australian Repatriation Medical Authority to formulate decision-making
instruments
|
R68
|
The expert medical panel should have a similar membership to the current
Expert Panel on Veterans’
Health, including medical experts in different fields, the NZDF
Director-General of Medical Services and a lay member with relevant
expertise.
The Minister of Veterans’ Affairs should appoint the panel members.
Nominations should come from both the RNZRSA
and the General Manager of VANZ.
The panel should be resourced so that it has administration and research support
available to it.
|
Accept
|
R69
|
The new legislation should establish an independent veterans’
advisory board with the function of advising the Minister of Veterans’
Affairs on issues concerning the legislation and its administration, as well as
on other veteran-related issues. It should have up
to six members who are
nominated by the RNZRSA or other veterans’ organisations and appointed by
the Minister. The board should
meet approximately five times per year.
Administrative support should be provided by VANZ.
|
Accept
|
R70
|
The new legislation should require VANZ to develop a code of
claimants’ rights.
|
Accept
|
R71
|
The NZDF should keep a register of all veterans known to have been exposed
to certain factors during qualifying operational deployments.
|
Accept
|
Chapter 9 — Impairment Compensation
|
||
Rec No
|
Law Commission Recommendation
|
Government Response
|
R72
|
Scheme One should include a Disablement Pension to replace the War
Disablement Pension. This should be a tax-free, periodic payment
for
service-related impairment.
|
Accept
|
R73
|
The Disablement Pension should commence from the date of receipt of the
written application, unless there was an administrative error.
|
Accept
|
R74
|
The Disablement Pension should cease four weeks after the recipient’s
death.
|
Accept
|
R75
|
Current recipients of the Disablement Pension should have their rate of
pension grandparented and receive their current rate plus
any increase pursuant
to recommendation 85. If current recipients apply for a new condition under the
new legislation, they should
be assessed under the whole of body assessment
method.
|
Accept
|
R76
|
New recipients of the Disablement Pension after the introduction of the new
legislation should be assessed using whole person impairment
percentages rather
than cumulatively adding the individual impairment percentages of each accepted
injury or illness. The maximum
rate of pension for new recipients would be given
to those with impairment of 80% or higher.
|
Accept
|
R77
|
The rates of Disablement Pension for those with the most severe levels of
impairment should be proportionally higher.
|
Accept
|
R78
|
The legislation should require that Disablement Pensions are either
temporary or permanent. A permanent pension should only be awarded
after an
injury or illness has reached a stable, permanent state. When a temporary
pension is awarded, a decision must be made regarding
the appropriate period
after which the level of impairment should be reassessed. The decision-makers
should be able to extend the
temporary pension where there is a likelihood that
the level of impairment will continue to change. After a medical assessment
showing
that the injury or illness has reached a stable, permanent state, the
decision-maker should determine whether there is ongoing impairment
and award a
permanent pension
if there is. Those awarded temporary pension should be given a treatment or
rehabilitation plan by
|
Accept
|
|
VANZ staff and have their level of impairment reassessed once this has been
completed.
|
|
Rec No
|
Law Commission Recommendation
|
Government Response
|
R79
|
Scheme One should only allow reassessment of a Disablement Pension after at
least two years have elapsed since that veteran has had
his or her whole person
impairment assessed or reassessed. However, it should be possible for
Disablement Pension recipients to request
reassessment of their level of
service-related impairment within two years of their last assessment if there is
evidence that their
impairment has significantly increased and that this is due
to service-related conditions. “Significantly” should be
defined as
an increase of 10 or more percent in whole body impairment.
|
Accept
|
R80
|
VANZ should have the ability to initiate a reassessment of the level of
impairment if it considers that the level of service-related
impairment has
changed.
|
Accept
|
R81
|
The expert medical panel should create guidelines on medical conditions for
which it should be presumed that any deterioration after
a veteran has left
service is not service-related.
|
Accept
|
R82
|
Scheme One should not allow Disablement Pension applications for new
medical conditions or reviews of existing accepted conditions
after veterans
have reached the age of 80 years.
|
Not progressed
This would discriminate against veterans aged 80+, and reduce entitlements
available under the current legislation
|
R83
|
The legislation should allow a veteran’s full New Zealand Disablement
Pension entitlement to be paid at the same time as an
overseas equivalent
pension as long as the pensions relate to different medical conditions.
|
Not progressed
No veteran should be able to receive a greater amount of compensation than
they would receive under the New
Zealand war pensions legislation
|
Rec No
|
Law Commission Recommendation
|
Government Response
|
R84
|
Those diagnosed with a terminal service-related injury or illness should
have the option of electing to receive one year’s worth
of the maximum
rate of the Disablement Pension paid as a lump sum to cover the period of one
year following the terminal diagnosis.
|
Accept
|
R85
|
The Government should consider some meaningful increase to the rates of the
Disablement Pension.
|
Accept
|
R86
|
The legislation should provide that the Disablement Pension is increased
annually in line with any change in the consumer price index.
|
Accept
|
Chapter 10 — Compensation for Loss of Income
|
||
Rec No
|
Law Commission Recommendation
|
Government Response
|
R87
|
Scheme One should provide a Veterans’ Weekly Income Compensation
(VWIC) payment for veterans of qualifying operational service
who are under 65
years and are unable to work because of their service- related impairment.
|
Accept with amendment
Limiting this entitlement to veterans unable to work due to a
service-related impairment would be more restrictive than the provisions
in the
1954 Act. Veterans unable to work due
to any medical reason will qualify for this entitlement
|
R88
|
Every recipient of VWIC should be required to have a rehabilitation plan in
place.
|
Accept
|
R89
|
Current under 65 year old recipients of the Veteran’s Pension should
be able to transfer to VWIC if they meet the eligibility
criteria. Current under
65 year old recipients of the Veteran’s Pension that choose not to apply
for VWIC would remain on Veteran’s
Pension, with the current rules for
that payment continuing to apply.
|
Accept
|
Rec No
|
Law Commission Recommendation
|
Government Response
|
R90
|
The rate of VWIC should be based on 80 % of the average wage.
|
Accept
|
R91
|
VWIC should be paid to eligible veterans up until they turn 65 years
old.
|
Accept in principle
VWIC to be paid to eligible veterans up until the age of entitlement for NZ
Superannuation
|
R92
|
If a recipient of VWIC is able to resume some work, the VWIC payment should
be reduced so as to ensure that the total of the veteran’s
VWIC and
earnings does not exceed the average wage.
|
Accept
|
R93
|
The legislation should allow a veteran residing overseas to receive VWIC.
However, if there are any costs associated with the assessment
of the
veteran’s eligibility for the entitlement, VANZ should not be required to
meet the costs of assessing the veteran overseas
or of the return of the veteran
to New Zealand.
|
Accept
|
R94
|
The Veteran’s Pension for veterans 65 years and over should be
retained.
|
Accept in principle
Veteran’s Pension to be paid from the age of entitlement to NZ
Superannuation
|
R95
|
All veterans with qualifying operational service should be eligible for the
Veteran’s Pension, regardless of whether they have
received impairment
compensation.
|
Not progressed at this point in time
The intent/focus of government is to assist veterans who have been
adversely affected by their service
|
Chapter 11 — Health Care
|
||
Rec No
|
Law Commission Recommendation
|
Government Response
|
R96
|
Scheme One should retain the provision of funding for a veteran’s
medical costs relating to all accepted injuries and illnesses.
|
Accept
|
R97
|
At the time that an injury or illness is accepted, VANZ should decide on
the medical treatment that is approved for that condition.
|
Accept
|
R98
|
Veterans with accepted injuries or illnesses should be provided with a
treatment card that allows health care providers to access
information on
exactly what medical treatment VANZ has approved.
|
Accept
|
R99
|
VANZ should be able to consider paying for treatment costs additional to
those that are approved at the time of the acceptance of
the condition but only
after special application by the veteran or his or her GP.
|
Accept
|
R100
|
The new legislation should set out the criteria against which all treatment
should be considered. The following criteria should be
considered:
• the treatment is necessary and appropriate, and of the quality
required, for this purpose;
• the treatment will be performed only on the number of occasions
necessary for this purpose;
• the treatment will be given at a time and place appropriate for
this purpose;
• the treatment is of a type normally provided by a treatment
provider;
|
Accept
|
R101
|
In making a decision on treatment VANZ should take into account:
• the nature and severity of the injury;
|
Accept
|
|
• the cost in New Zealand of the generally accepted means of
treatment; and
|
|
Rec No
|
Law Commission Recommendation
|
Government Response
|
R102
|
The legislation should allow for veterans to be paid the necessary travel
costs to receive medical treatment. ACC regulations should
be used as a model
for the rules relating to when and to what extent travel costs are paid.
|
Accept with amendment
Scheme One veterans to be grandparented under rates in the 1954 Act to
avoid a reduction in payment rate
|
R103
|
VANZ should establish regulations and policy that set out what health care
assistance is covered. These regulations should define
“treatment”
and the exact bounds and cost limits of what is covered by each type of
assistance.
|
Accept
|
R104
|
Any veteran who is in receipt of a Disablement Pension and is 80 years or
over should be entitled to receive in relation to any medical
condition
(regardless of whether the condition is related to service):
• funding of GP visits;
• funding of pharmaceuticals that are subsidised through
Pharmac;
• funding of specialist consultations with a registered medical
practitioner; and
• in respect of certain specified types of surgery:
• funding for the first specialist’s assessment to be
undertaken at a private hospital; and
|
Not progressed at this point in time
The intent/focus of government is to provide assistance to veterans who
have impairments directly related to their military service
|
R105
|
The Government should consider funding the full cost of surgeries covered
by this entitlement through
Vote Veterans’ Affairs rather than Vote Health.
|
Not progressed
The initiative to provide free surgery is not being progressed
|
Rec No
|
Law Commission Recommendation
|
Government Response
|
R106
|
Over 80 year old veterans that qualify for this entitlement should receive
a veteran’s card that identifies this.
|
Not progressed
The entitlement that would require the card is not being progressed
|
Chapter 12 — Independence Assistance
|
||
Rec No
|
Law Commission Recommendation
|
Government Response
|
R107
|
The following persons would qualify for the Veterans’ Independence
Programme (VIP): -
|
Accept with amendment
All veterans in receipt of impairment compensation to be eligible on the
basis of need
|
R108
|
The services provided under VIP should include:
• personal care — assistance
with the tasks of daily living;
|
Accept in principle
The services to be provided will meet the individual needs of the veteran
and will not be restricted to a particular list
|
Rec No
|
Law Commission Recommendation
|
Government Response
|
R109
|
A special category of independence assistance should be provided for
veterans who are not in receipt of a Disablement Pension, but
who have
qualifying operational service. These veterans should be eligible to have a case
manager and to receive some VIP services
on a discretionary basis.
|
Accept with amendment
Veterans with qualifying service not in receipt of impairment compensation
to receive assistance on a discretionary basis.
|
R110
|
The new legislation should adopt the travel concession amendments announced
by the Government in
December 2009.
|
Accept
|
R111
|
A decoration allowance should be incorporated into other legislation.
|
Not progressed
No other suitable legislation could be identified
|
Chapter 13 — Rehabilitation
|
||
Rec No
|
Law Commission Recommendation
|
Government Response
|
R112
|
Veterans that are assessed as being able to rehabilitate from their
service-related injury or illness should be provided with rehabilitation
services.
|
Accept
|
Chapter 14 — Families
|
||
Rec No
|
Law Commission Recommendation
|
Government Response
|
R113
|
The new legislation should provide that the surviving spouse, civil union
partner or de facto partner of any person who was in receipt
of a Disablement
Pension when he or she died is eligible for a Surviving Spouse Pension.
|
Not progressed at this point in time
The intent behind this pension was to support the dependents of seriously
injured veterans in times when veterans were
likely to be the sole income earner in the family
|
R114
|
Every eligible spouse or partner should receive an amount of pension that
is proportional to the level of
Disablement Pension that the veteran was receiving prior to death, for
instance, 50%.
|
Not progressed at this point in time
The intent behind this pension was to support the dependents of seriously
injured veterans in times when veterans were
likely to be the sole income earner in the family
|
R115
|
The Surviving Spouse Pension should cease if the surviving spouse or
partner remarries or enters a new civil union or de facto relationship.
The
legislation should continue to provide a lump sum payment of two years’
worth of Surviving Spouse Pension when the surviving
spouse or partner enters
the new relationship. Once the Surviving Spouse Pension has ceased because of a
new relationship, it should
not be reinstated if the new relationship ends.
|
Accept
|
R116
|
A Children’s Pension (combining the current Parent’s Allowance
and Children’s Pension) should be paid to children
of veterans with a
service-related death or who received a Disablement Pension for impairment
equivalent to the current 70% level.
The definition of “child”
should include adopted children
|
Accept with amendment
Discretion for the Children’s
Pension to be paid until the
|
|
and step-children and apply until the child turns 18.
|
age of 23 if the child is in full time study to match provisions
in the 1954 Act for the payment of bursaries.
|
Rec No
|
Law Commission Recommendation
|
Government Response
|
R117
|
The new legislation should retain the war bursaries and the Government
should consider increasing the amounts paid.
|
Accept
|
R118
|
A funeral grant should be paid on the death of any veteran who had
qualifying operational service, regardless of whether he or she
received
impairment compensation. A funeral grant should also be paid in respect of
persons with routine service whose death is attributable
to their service or who
qualify under current legislation.
|
Not progressed at this point in time
The intent/focus of government is to provide assistance to veterans who
have impairments directly related to their military service.
|
R119
|
The funeral grant should be for the actual costs of the funeral up to a
specified maximum that is no less than ACC’s funeral
grant.
|
Not progressed at this point in time
The current funeral grant rate is a contribution towards the cost of a
funeral, and is not intended to cover the full cost as individual
requirements
vary greatly.
|
R120
|
VIP services should be available for surviving spouses or partners of
deceased veterans for up to one year if they are assessed as
needing it.
|
Accept
|
Chapter 16— Rehabilitation
|
||
Rec No
|
Law Commission Recommendation
|
Government Response
|
R121
|
The new legislation should create an obligation on the Government to
rehabilitate any veteran who becomes impaired as a result of
qualifying
operational service and who is assessed as being capable of rehabilitating in
order that the veteran can recover to the
maximum extent practicable.
|
Accept
|
R122
|
The services provided should cover medical, psycho-social and vocational
rehabilitation.
|
Accept
|
R123
|
The General Manager of VANZ should have the discretion to provide
rehabilitation services to any veteran in relation to a physical
or mental
impairment if he or she is satisfied that it is likely to have been caused by
qualifying operational service, such that
a claim for impairment compensation
would be tenable if the impairment proved permanent.
|
Accept
|
R124
|
VANZ should have an obligation to make sure that a rehabilitation plan and
case manager are put in place for each veteran who qualifies
for rehabilitation
services.
|
Accept
|
R125
|
Any veteran receiving rehabilitation services should have an obligation to
cooperate with VANZ in determining the rehabilitation services
that can be
supplied and to participate in the rehabilitation.
|
Accept
|
R126
|
Scheme Two should provide vocational rehabilitation to a veteran’s
spouse or partner if the veteran is assessed as being unable
to make use of
rehabilitation because of serious, permanent incapacity that causes the veteran
to be unable to work.
|
Accept
|
Chapter 17— Compensation for loss of income
|
||
Rec No
|
Law Commission Recommendation
|
Government Response
|
R127
|
The new legislation should provide that Veterans’ Weekly Income
Compensation (VWIC) will be paid to a veteran with qualifying
operational
service who is unable to work because of a service-related injury or illness and
is participating in a rehabilitation
plan.
|
Accept
|
Rec No
|
Law Commission Recommendation
|
Government Response
|
R128
|
The new legislation should provide for veterans to receive income
compensation (whether through VWIC or a combination of VWIC and
ACC income
compensation) at a rate of 100% of their earnings prior to the service-related
injury or illness that has made them unable
to work. VWIC would be paid at this
rate for either:
• one year; or
• the period during which the veteran is receiving rehabilitation
services, whichever is the shorter.
After this period, veterans who:
• continue to have a rehabilitation plan in place and have incapacity
for work; or
• are unable to rehabilitate further and have incapacity for
work,
would continue to be eligible for VWIC, but at 85 % of pre-incapacity
earnings.
|
Accept
|
R129
|
VWIC should cease after the veteran is assessed as no longer having
incapacity for work or after the veteran turns 65 or (if the veteran
elects to
continue receiving VWIC rather than Veteran’s Pension) 66.
|
Accept
|
R130
|
If a recipient of VWIC is able to resume some work, the VWIC payment should
be reduced so as to ensure that the total of the veteran’s
VWIC’s
and earnings does not exceed their pre-injury earnings.
|
Accept
|
R131
|
The legislation should allow a veteran residing overseas to receive VWIC.
However, if there are any costs associated with the assessment
of the
veteran’s eligibility for the entitlement, VANZ should not be required to
meet the costs of assessing the veteran overseas
or of the return of the veteran
to New Zealand.
|
Accept
|
R132
|
The new legislation should provide a retirement lump sum payment, for
instance $25,000, for veterans who have received VWIC for 10
years or more, and
who meet an asset test.
|
Accept
|
Chapter 18— Compensation for Permanent Impairment
|
||
Rec No
|
Law Commission Recommendation
|
Government Response
|
R133
|
Scheme Two should provide for tax free lump sum impairment compensation to
be paid at a rate dependent upon the level of whole person
service-related
impairment.
|
Accept
|
R134
|
Levels of impairment should be assessed in 1% increments.
|
Operational Issue
|
R135
|
Impairment compensation should only be paid for impairment of 10% or
higher.
|
Accept with amendment
Impairment compensation to be paid for impairment of 5% or higher to match
the entitlements under the 1954
Act
|
R136
|
The lump sum payment should only be paid once the condition has settled
into a stable level of impairment.
|
Accept
|
R137
|
The lump sum compensation for impairment under the new veterans’
entitlements scheme should be set at a level that is equivalent
to the ACC lump
sum impairment compensation amounts with an additional percentage, such as 20%,
on top of this. However, consideration
should be given to setting the
impairment compensation for the highest levels of impairment at amounts
that are proportionally higher.
|
Accept
|
R138
|
The legislation should provide that, where ACC lump sum impairment
compensation is paid for the same injury, the full impairment compensation
amount that the veteran is entitled to under the veterans’ scheme will be
made up of the ACC lump sum and a veterans’
impairment compensation lump
sum.
|
Accept
|
R139
|
Scheme Two should only allow reassessment of the percentage that a veteran
is impaired due to service after at least two years have
elapsed since that
veteran has had his or her whole person impairment assessed or reassessed.
However, it should be possible for
impairment compensation recipients to request
reassessment of their level of service-related impairment within two years of
their
last assessment
|
Accept
|
|
if there is evidence that their impairment has significantly increased and
that this is due to service-related conditions. “Significantly”
should be defined as an increase of ten or more percent in whole body
impairment.
|
|
Rec No
|
Law Commission Recommendation
|
Government Response
|
R140
|
Scheme Two should not allow Disablement Pension applications for new
medical conditions or reviews of existing accepted conditions
after veterans
have reached the age of 80 years.
|
Not progressed
This would discriminate against veterans aged 80+, and reduce entitlements
available under the current legislation
|
R141
|
The new legislation should provide for recipients of lump sum payments to
receive funding of up to a set maximum for professional
financial advice if they
choose to obtain this.
|
Accept
|
Chapter 19— Health Care Benefits
|
||
Rec No
|
Law Commission Recommendation
|
Government Response
|
R142
|
Scheme Two should retain the provision of funding for a veteran’s
medical costs relating to all accepted injuries and illnesses.
|
Accept
|
R143
|
At the time that an injury or illness is accepted, VANZ should decide on
the medical treatment that is approved for that condition.
|
Accept
|
R144
|
Veterans with accepted injuries or illnesses should be provided with a
treatment card that allows health care providers to access
information on
exactly what medical treatment VANZ has approved.
|
Accept
|
R145
|
VANZ should be able to consider paying for treatment costs additional to
those that are approved at the time of the acceptance of
the condition but only
after special application by the veteran or his or her GP.
|
Accept
|
Rec No
|
Law Commission Recommendation
|
Government Response
|
R146
|
The new legislation should set out the criteria against which all treatment
should be considered. The following criteria should be
considered:
• the treatment is necessary and appropriate, and of the quality
required, for this purpose;
• the treatment will be performed only on the number of occasions
necessary for this purpose;
• the treatment will be given at a time and place appropriate for
this purpose;
• the treatment is of a type normally provided by a treatment
provider;
|
Accept
|
R147
|
In making a decision on treatment VANZ should take into account:
• the nature and severity of the injury;
|
Accept
|
R148
|
The legislation should allow for veterans to be paid the necessary travel
costs to receive medical treatment. ACC regulations should
be used as a model
for the rules relating to when and to what extent travel costs are paid.
|
Accept
|
R149
|
VANZ should establish regulations and policy that set out what health care
assistance is covered. These regulations should define
“treatment”
and the exact bounds and cost limits of what is covered by each type of
assistance.
|
Accept
|
R150
|
Any veteran who is in receipt of a Disablement Pension and is 80 years or
over should be entitled to receive in relation to any medical
condition
(regardless-of whether the condition is related to service):
• funding of GP visits;
|
Not progressed at this point in time
The intent/focus of
|
|
• and
in respect of certain specified types of surgery:
• funding for the first specialist’s assessment to be
undertaken at a private hospital; and
|
government is to provide assistance to veterans who
have impairments directly related to their military service
|
Rec No
|
Law Commission Recommendation
|
Government Response
|
R151
|
The Government should consider funding the full cost of surgeries covered
by this entitlement through
Vote Veterans’ Affairs rather than Vote Health.
|
Not progressed
The initiative to provide free surgery is not being progressed
|
R152
|
Over 80 year old veterans that qualify for this entitlement should receive
a veteran’s card that identifies this.
|
Not progressed
The entitlement that would require the card is not being progressed
|
Chapter 20 — Independence Assistance
|
||
Rec No
|
Law Commission Recommendation
|
Government Response
|
R153
|
The following persons should qualify for the Veterans’ Independence
Programme (VIP) under Scheme
Two:
• Veterans with qualifying operational service
who are over 80 years old and in receipt of a Disablement
Pension. This group would receive assistance based on needs arising from
any medical condition on.
|
Accept in principle
All veterans in receipt of impairment compensation to be eligible on the
basis of need
|
Rec No
|
Law Commission Recommendation
|
Government Response
|
R154
|
The services provided under VIP should include:
|
Accept in principle
The services to be provided will meet the individual
needs of the veteran and will not be restricted to a particular list
|
R155
|
A special category of independence assistance should be provided for
veterans who have not received impairment compensation, but who
have qualifying
operational service. These veterans should be eligible to have a case manager
and to receive some VIP services on
a discretionary basis.
|
Accept with amendment
Veterans with qualifying service not in receipt of impairment compensation
to receive assistance on a discretionary basis
|
Chapter 21 — Transition Assistance
|
||
Rec No
|
Law Commission Recommendation
|
Government Response
|
R156
|
The NZDF should be required to provide all members of the armed forces,
including Reserve Forces, with transition assistance when
they leave the armed
forces.
|
Not progressed
The matter is under review by NZDF
|
R157
|
Job placement assistance, including job search training, career counselling
and job finding assistance, should be available to all
members of the forces
when they are leaving the armed forces.
|
Not progressed
The matter is under review by NZDF
|
Rec No
|
Law Commission Recommendation
|
Government Response
|
R158
|
VANZ should educate currently serving veterans with qualifying operational
service about what is provided for veterans under the legislative
scheme.
|
Accept
|
Chapter 22 — Recognition of Service for Senior Veterans
|
||
Rec No
|
Law Commission Recommendation
|
Government Response
|
R159
|
Scheme Two should retain the Veteran’s Pension for veterans 65 years
and over.
|
Accept in principle
Veteran’s Pension to be paid from the age of entitlement
to NZ Superannuation
|
R160
|
All veterans with qualifying operational service should be eligible for the
Veteran’s Pension, regardless of whether they have
received impairment
compensation.
|
Not progressed at this point in time
The intent/focus of government is to assist veterans who have been
adversely affected by their service
|
Chapter 23 — Families
|
||
Rec No
|
Law Commission Recommendation
|
Government Response
|
R161
|
Spouses or partners of veterans with a service related death should be
eligible for assistance. We recommend that Scheme Two define
a service-related
death as:
• death during qualifying service;
• death more than 10
years of qualifying service from an accepted late onset condition.
|
Accept
|
Rec No
|
Law Commission Recommendation
|
Government Response
|
R162
|
The new legislation should provide a lump sum compensation payment of
approximately $20,000 for surviving spouses.
|
Accept with amendment
Lump sum payment to be
$25,000
|
R163
|
When a spouse qualifies for ACC in respect of the veteran’s death,
ACC should pay the survivor’s grant under ACC legislation
and VANZ should
pay the amount required to top the total payment up to the amount the spouse is
entitled to under veterans’
legislation.
|
Accept
|
R164
|
Spouses and partners of deceased veterans should be provided with weekly
income compensation at a rate of 60% of the veteran’s
earnings. This
entitlement would last for five years or for as long as the spouse is caring for
a child of the veteran who is under
18 years.
|
Accept
|
R165
|
Surviving spouses who qualify for entitlements should be entitled to VIP
services for up to one year following the veteran’s
death.
|
Accept
|
R166
|
Scheme Two should allow for the surviving spouse to receive vocational
rehabilitation services.
|
Accept
|
R167
|
Every child (under 18 years) of a deceased veteran with a service-related
death should receive a lump sum payment. This could be set
at $5,000.
|
Accept with amendment
Lump sum payment to be
$10,000
|
R168
|
Weekly compensation of a share of 20% of the veteran’s earnings prior
to death should be divided equally between the children
of the deceased veteran
as weekly income compensation and paid to each child until he or she reaches 18
years or 21 years if he or
she continues in full time study.
|
Accept with amendment
Discretion for the impairment compensation to be paid
until the age of 23 if the child is in full time study to match provisions
in the 1954 Act for the payment of bursaries
|
Rec No
|
Law Commission Recommendation
|
Government Response
|
R169
|
A funeral grant should be paid on the death of any veteran who had
qualifying operational service, regardless of whether he or she
received
impairment compensation.
|
Not progressed at this point in time
The intent/focus of government is to provide assistance to veterans who
have impairments directly related to their military service.
|
R170
|
The funeral grant should be for the actual costs of the funeral up to a
specified maximum that is no less than ACC’s funeral
grant.
|
Not progressed at this point in time
The current funeral grant
rate is a contribution towards the cost of a funeral, and is not intended
to cover the full cost as individual requirements vary greatly.
|
NZLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/other/lawreform/NZLCGovResp/2012/115.html