You are here:
NZLII >>
Databases >>
New Zealand Bill of Rights Act Reports >>
2022 >>
[2022] NZBORARp 24
Database Search
| Name Search
| Recent Documents
| Noteup
| LawCite
| Download
| Help
Aotearoa New Zealand Public Media Bill (Consistent) (Section 19) [2022] NZBORARp 24 (2 June 2022)
Last Updated: 20 August 2022
![2022_2400.jpg](2022_2400.jpg)
2 June 2022
LEGAL ADVICE
LPA 01 01 24
Hon David Parker, Attorney-General
Consistency with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990: Aotearoa New Zealand
Public Media Bill
Purpose
- We
have considered whether the Aotearoa New Zealand Public Media Bill (the Bill) is
consistent with the rights and freedoms affirmed
in the New Zealand Bill of
Rights Act 1990 (the Bill of Rights Act).
- We
have not yet received a final version of the Bill. This advice has been prepared
in relation to the latest version of the Bill
(PCO 22581/1.15). We will provide
you with further advice if the final version includes amendments that affect the
conclusions in
this advice.
- We
have concluded that the Bill appears to be consistent with the rights and
freedoms affirmed in the Bill of Rights Act. In reaching
that conclusion, we
have considered the consistency of the Bill with section 19, the right to be
free from discrimination. Our analysis
is set out
below.
The Bill
- The
media landscape in New Zealand is changing rapidly with increasing competition
from online content providers and a shift to online
platforms for entertainment
and for news and current affairs. That landscape will continue to change as
technology evolves and the
delivery of content changes.
- In
response to these changes, the Government seeks to strengthen the delivery of
public media services to New Zealanders, and ensure
that all New Zealanders can
access relevant and trusted public media content across the platforms they use
by –
- better
aligning Government investment across platforms, increasing flexibility to
respond to future demographic and technological
changes, and reducing
inefficiencies;
- ensuring
a more sustainable long-term funding model; and
- enabling
a greater focus on currently under-served and under-represented audiences while
continuing to provide for existing audiences.
- The
Government also intends to consider and provide for Māori interests through
delivery of public media services.
- To
achieve those objectives, the Bill establishes Aotearoa New Zealand Public
Media, as a public broadcaster and autonomous Crown
entity, and provides for its
objectives, functions, operating principles, and governance. The Bill also
dissolves Radio New Zealand
and Television New Zealand and provides for
transitional arrangements for the transfer of the Crown’s provision of
public broadcasting
from Radio New Zealand and Television New Zealand to
Aotearoa New Zealand Public Media.
Consistency of the Bill with the Bill of Rights Act
Section 19 – Freedom from Discrimination
- Section
19(1) of the Bill of Rights Act affirms that everyone has the right to freedom
from discrimination on the grounds of discrimination
in the Human Rights Act
1993 (the Human Rights Act).
- The
key questions in assessing whether there is a limit on the right to freedom from
discrimination are:1
- does
the legislation draw a distinction on one of the prohibited grounds of
discrimination under section 21 of the Human Rights Act;
and, if so
- does
the distinction involve disadvantage to one or more classes of individuals?
- Clause
10(1) provides that the board of Aotearoa New Zealand Public Media (the Board)
consists of six to nine members. At least two
Board members must be appointed
who, in the opinion of the Minister of Finance (after consulting with the
Minister for Māori
Development), are qualified for the appointment, having
regard to their knowledge of te ao Māori and tikanga Māori.
- This
provision could be seen as giving rise to indirect discrimination on the basis
of race or ethnic origins, because Māori
are more likely than
non-Māori to have knowledge of te ao Māori and tikanga Māori.
This could arguably disadvantage
non-Maori in their ability to be appointed as a
member of the Board.
- To
the extent that this could be potential discrimination, we consider it to be
justified in terms of section 5 of the Bill of Rights
Act because it is
important that members of the Board have the requisite knowledge to be able to
engage with Māori about its
relevant strategies and policies, in order to
provide for Māori interests through delivery of public media services. We
consider
this emphasis is necessary to give effect to the Crown’s
commitment under te Tiriti o Waitangi in a meaningful and practical
way.
- We
also note that the requirement does not prevent non-Māori from being
appointed, it simply requires at least two members of
the total six to nine
members to have the relevant knowledge.
1 See, for example, Atkinson v Minister
of Health and others [2010] NZHRRT 1; McAlister v Air New Zealand
[2009] NZSC 78; and Child Poverty Action Group v Attorney-General
[2008] NZHRRT 31.
Conclusion
- We
have concluded that the Bill appears to be consistent with the rights and
freedoms affirmed in the Bill of Rights Act.
![2022_2401.jpg](2022_2401.jpg)
Jeff Orr
Chief Legal Counsel Office of Legal Counsel
NZLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/other/NZBORARp/2022/24.html