You are here:
NZLII >>
Databases >>
New Zealand Bill of Rights Act Reports >>
2021 >>
[2021] NZBORARp 84
Database Search
| Name Search
| Recent Documents
| Noteup
| LawCite
| Download
| Help
Accident Compensation (Maternal Birth Injury and Other Matters) Amendment Bill (Consistent) (Section 19) [2021] NZBORARp 84 (18 November 2021)
Last Updated: 13 December 2021
![2021_8400.jpg](2021_8400.jpg)
18 November 2021
LEGAL ADVICE
LPA 01 01 24
Hon David Parker, Attorney-General
Consistency with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990: Accident Compensation
(Maternal Birth Injury and Other Matters) Amendment
Bill
- We
have considered whether the Accident Compensation (Maternal Birth Injury and
Other Matters) Amendment Bill (the Bill) is consistent
with the rights and
freedoms affirmed in the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 (the Bill of Rights
Act).
- We
have not yet received a final version of the Bill. This advice has been prepared
in relation to the latest version of the Bill
(PCO 22578/2.1). We will provide
you with further advice if the final version includes amendments that affect the
conclusions in
this advice.
- We
have concluded that the Bill appears to be consistent with the rights and
freedoms affirmed in the Bill of Rights Act. In reaching
that conclusion, we
have considered the consistency of the Bill with s 19 (freedom from
discrimination) of the Bill of Rights Act.
Our analysis is set out
below.
The Bill
![2021_8401.jpg](2021_8401.jpg)
- The
Bill amends the Accident Compensation Act 2001 (the Act), and makes
consequential amendments to the Accident Compensation (Definitions)
Regulations
2019 and the Injury Prevention, Rehabilitation, and Compensation (Interest Rate
for Late Payment of Levies) Regulations
2002.
- The
Bill’s objectives, as set out in the explanatory note, are to
“increase the equity of injuries covered by the Accident
Compensation
Scheme”, to provide greater clarity to claimants, and better give effect
to the policy intent of the Act.
- The
Bill;
- Expands
the types of injuries covered by the Act;
- Clarifies
test requirements;
- Updates
the Act in light of the End of Life Choice Act 2019; and,
- Provides
for a number of other minor technical amendments relating to definitions and
other matters.
Consistency of the Bill with the Bill of Rights Act
![2021_8401.jpg](2021_8401.jpg)
Section 19 Freedom of expression
- Section
19(1) of the Bill of Rights Act affirms that everyone has the right to freedom
from discrimination on the grounds set out
in the Human Rights Act 1993 (the
Human Rights Act).
- The
key questions in assessing whether there is a limit on the right to
freedom from discrimination are whether the legislation
draws a distinction on
one of the prohibited grounds of discrimination under s 21 of the Human Rights
Act and, if so, whether the
distinction involve disadvantage to one or more
classes of individuals.1
- A
distinction will arise if the legislation treats two comparable groups of people
differently on one or more of the prohibited grounds
of
discrimination.2 Whether disadvantage arises is a
factual determination.
- Clause
5 inserts a new definition of “child” into s 17 of the Act. Section
17 sets out the requirements for a person to
be considered ordinarily resident
in New Zealand (some entitlements under the principal Act are only available to
those ordinarily
resident in New Zealand) and provides that, in certain
circumstances, children and other dependants of someone who is ordinarily
resident in New Zealand are also considered to be ordinarily resident in New
Zealand. The new definitions align with the approach
taken to children and other
dependants of deceased claimants in clause 70 of Schedule 1.
- The
new definition will result in children of New Zealand citizens by descent being
ineligible for coverage under the Act for injuries
that occur overseas if they
are over the age of 18, or, are over the age of 21 and not in full-time study.
We consider this is a
disadvantage, and accordingly the clause amounts to a
discrimination on the basis of age.
Is the limitation justified and proportionate under s 5 of the
Bill of Rights Act?
- Where
a provision is found to limit a particular right or freedom, it may nevertheless
be consistent with the Bill of Rights Act if
it can be considered a reasonable
limit that is justifiable in terms of s 5 of that Act. The limitation will be
considered justified
where the objective of the provision is sufficiently
important to justify differential treatment on the basis of age, the limitation
is rationally connected and proportionate to achieving that objective, and the
limitation is no more than reasonably necessary to
achieve the
objective.3
- We
consider the differential treatment outlined in clause 5 to be rationally
connected to the primary purpose of the Act, which is
to use funds levied from
New Zealanders to minimise both the overall incidence of injury in the New
Zealand community, and the impact
of injury on the community (including
economic, social, and personal costs).
- We
also consider that is it reasonable to limit the coverage for overseas injuries
to those with an appropriate degree of connection
to the New Zealand community.
Children under
1 See, for example, McAlister v Air New
Zealand[2009] NZSC 78[2009] NZSC 78; , [2010] 1 NZLR 153; Ministry of Health v Atkinson[2012]
NZCA 184[2012] NZCA 184; , [2012] 3 NZLR 456; and Child Poverty Action Group Inc v
Attorney-General[2013] NZCA 402[2013] NZCA 402; , [2013] 3 NZLR 729.
2 See, for example McAlister v Air New Zealand above
n 6 at [40] per Elias CJ, Blanchard and Wilson JJ.
3 Hansen v R [2007] NZSC 7 at [123].
the age of 18, and those under the age of 21 who are in full-time study, have
a reasonable connection to New Zealand through the combination
of their
dependency on their parents and their parents’ ties with New Zealand. We
consider that treating independent adult
children of “ordinarily
resident” New Zealanders differently from dependent children is a
reasonable and proportionate
limit on the right to be free from discrimination
on the basis of age.
- We
have concluded that the Bill appears to be consistent with the rights and
freedoms affirmed in the Bill of Rights Act.
![2021_8402.jpg](2021_8402.jpg)
Jeff Orr
Chief Legal Counsel Office of Legal Counsel
NZLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/other/NZBORARp/2021/84.html