You are here:
NZLII >>
Databases >>
New Zealand Bill of Rights Act Reports >>
2020 >>
[2020] NZBORARp 55
Database Search
| Name Search
| Recent Documents
| Noteup
| LawCite
| Download
| Help
Adverse Weather-affected Timber Recovery on Conservation Lands Bill (Consistent) [2020] NZBORARp 55 (27 November 2020)
Last Updated: 1 January 2021
![2020_5500.jpg](2020_5500.jpg)
27 November 2020
LEGAL ADVICE
LPA 01 01 24
Hon David Parker, Attorney-General
Consistency with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990: Adverse Weather-
affected Timber Recovery on Conservation Lands Bill
- We
have considered whether the Adverse Weather-affected Timber Recovery on
Conservation Lands Bill (‘the Bill’) is consistent
with the rights
and freedoms affirmed in the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 (‘the
Bill of Rights Act’). This is
a member’s Bill in the name of Maureen
Pugh MP.
- The
Bill allows the Director-General of Conservation to authorise the removal of
specified trees irreversibly damaged by an adverse
weather event from within the
conservation estate, outside of national parks.
- We
have concluded that the Bill appears to be consistent with the rights and
freedoms affirmed in the Bill of Rights Act.
- We
note that the Bill appears to be closely based on the West Coast Wind-Blown
Timber (Conservations Lands) Act 2014 (‘the Act’)
which expired and
was repealed on 1 July 2019.
- There
are some policy differences between the Act and the Bill. The Act was developed
in response to trees that were irreversibly
damaged by Cyclone Ita on the West
Coast of the South Island with removal to be completed within a 5-year period
and according to
the Act’s explanatory note (when introduced), the Act was
developed in consultation with Te Runanga o Ngāi Tahu with particular
regard given to their views.
- This
Bill applies to every conservation area and reserve that is owned by the Crown
and administered by the Department of Conservation,
other than nature or
scientific reserves, ecological areas or national parks and it does not expire
after a specified period of time
as the Act did. Also, it does not appear that
there has been any engagement with Māori in its development. This is
noteworthy
as, like the Act, the Bill overrides certain provisions of the
Resource Management Act 1991 that require resource consent. This removes
the
requirement to notify specified persons under the Resource Management Act,
including affected customary rights groups.
![2020_5501.jpg](2020_5501.jpg)
Jeff Orr
Chief Legal Counsel Office of Legal Counsel
NZLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/other/NZBORARp/2020/55.html