You are here:
NZLII >>
Databases >>
New Zealand Bill of Rights Act Reports >>
2019 >>
[2019] NZBORARp 40
Database Search
| Name Search
| Recent Documents
| Noteup
| LawCite
| Download
| Help
Vocational Education Reform Bill (Consistent) (Sections 14, 19) [2019] NZBORARp 40 (19 August 2019)
Last Updated: 17 September 2019
![2019_4000.jpg](2019_4000.jpg)
19 August 2019
LEGAL ADVICE
LPA 01 01 24
Hon David Parker, Attorney-General
Consistency with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990: Vocational Education
Reform Bill
Purpose
![2019_4001.jpg](2019_4001.jpg)
- We
have considered whether the Vocational Education Reform Bill (‘the
Bill’) is consistent with the rights and freedoms
affirmed in the New
Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 (‘the Bill of Rights Act’).
- We
have not yet received a final version of the Bill. This advice has been prepared
in relation to the latest version of the Bill
(PCO21821/3.0). We will provide
you with further advice if the final version of the Bill includes amendments
that affect the conclusions
in this advice.
The Bill
![2019_4001.jpg](2019_4001.jpg)
- The
Bill is an omnibus Bill, to be introduced in accordance with Standing Order
263(a). The amendments deal with an interrelated topic
that can be regarded as
implementing a single broad policy. The Bill will amend the Education Act 1989
and repeal the Industry Training
and Apprenticeships Act 1992. The purpose of
the Bill is to create a unified and cohesive vocational education and training
system.
Primarily, the Bill will achieve this by:
- establishing
a new regulatory environment for vocational tertiary education;
- establishing
the New Zealand Institute of Skills & Technology (the Institute) as a
tertiary education institution under the Education
Act 1989, and by providing
for all existing polytechnics to become subsidiaries of the Institute;
and
- enabling
workforce development councils to be established as bodies corporate by Order in
Council to provide skills leadership, set
standards and develop qualifications
for their specified industries.
Consistency of the Bill with the Bill of Rights Act
![2019_4001.jpg](2019_4001.jpg)
Section 14 - Freedom of Expression
- Several
provisions in the Bill require the provision of information. This
includes:
- financial
and operational information, which is to be provided by the workforce
development councils to the Tertiary Education Commission
(clause 10, the new
section 159FB), and an annual report to the Minister of Education for tabling in
the House (clause 57, the new
section 518);
- operational
information, which is to be provided by the Institute to the Tertiary Education
Commission for specified purposes (clause
42, the new section 222N);
and
- information,
which is to be provided by the Institute to a Crown observer, a Crown manager,
or specialist third-party advisor, in
circumstances where the Institute, any of
its subsidiaries, or the education performance of students are at risk (clause
42, the
new sections 222Q, 222R, and 222T).
- These
provisions limit the right to freedom of expression. Section 14 of the Bill of
Rights Act affirms that everyone has the right
to freedom of expression,
including the freedom to seek, receive, and impart information and opinions of
any kind in any form. The
right has been interpreted as including the right not
to be compelled to say certain things or to provide certain
information.1
- However,
the limits on section 14 are clearly justified in terms of section 5 of the Bill
of Rights Act. The limitation on freedom
of expression serves a sufficiently
important public objective and is rationally connected to the objective.
Workforce development
councils are expected to receive funding from industry via
a levy imposed by Order in Council. Further, the Institute will receive
significant public funding. It is appropriate that these entities are
transparent in the use of this funding and are publicly accountable.
Workforce
development councils and the Institute are also carrying out public functions of
significant social importance. The provision
of operational information in
specified contexts is necessary to ensure effective oversight of the bodies and
to protect the interests
of students.
- The
limitations on the freedom of expression are proportionate and go no further
than reasonably necessary to achieve their purpose.
The instances in which
information can be requested or required are generally limited to prescribed
circumstances as outlined in
each of the provisions.
Section 19 - Freedom of Discrimination
- Clause
42 of the Bill (the new section 222F) provides that a person is not eligible to
be appointed a member of the Institute’s
council if a personal or property
order has been made about them under the Protection of Personal and Property
Rights Act 1998. In
the case that a personal order has been made about the
person, the order must adversely reflect on the person’s competence
to
manage their own property affairs if they are to be prevented from being
appointed, or the person’s capacity to make or
communicate decisions
relating to their personal care and welfare.
- This
provision limits the right to be free from discrimination. Section 19(1) of the
Bill of Rights Act affirms the right to be free
from discrimination on the
prohibited grounds set out in the Human Rights Act 1993, which includes
disability. Disability is defined
the Human Rights Act 1993 as including
intellectual or psychological disability or impairment, along with psychiatric
illness.
- However,
the limits on section 19(1) are clearly justified in terms of section 5 of the
Bill of Rights Act. The exclusion of individuals
who are subject to a property
or personal order serves a sufficiently important public objective and is
rationally connected to the
1 See, for example, Slaight
Communications v Davidson 59 DLR (4th) 416;
Wooley v Maynard [1977] USSC 59; 430 US 705 (1977).
objective. It ensures that only those people capable of discharging the
relevant functions of the office are appointed. The exclusions
are proportionate
and go no further than reasonably necessary to achieve that purpose.
Conclusion
![2019_4001.jpg](2019_4001.jpg)
- We
have concluded that the Bill appears to be consistent with the rights and
freedoms affirmed in the Bill of Rights Act.
Edrick Child
Acting Chief Legal Counsel Office of Legal Counsel
NZLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.nzlii.org/nz/other/NZBORARp/2019/40.html